A Direct is announced for April 2nd to cover the games.

  • Uninvited Guest@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    So much for Nintendo’s previous naming conventions. I was really hoping for the New Super Nintendo Switch U.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      It occurred to me that this is the first time Nintendo has ever not used some new weird naming convention for a successor console. Just 2.

    • caut_R@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      They wanna make it very clear that this is their best-selling console ever but better, I would‘ve been surprised if they didn‘t just slap a 2 on it. There‘s so much riding on this for them.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        I don’t think Nintendo have ever done a Console 2 before though. I was hoping for Super Switch but as ever Nintendo absolutely refuse to be predictable!

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Cool for Nintendo fans but the ROG Ally has changed the game for me. I’ll miss Pokémon but they haven’t been good in a while so whatever.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Well Windows is a no for me on that. And while the steam deck is nice and the OS runs on the ally too, it’s still a pc with all it’s pros and cons.

      (I use both worlds BTW)

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        What are the pros and cons you’re considering, and how do they compare to the pros and cons of a Nintendo console?

        • Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          That’s a fair question which I have to cut a little short due to it being a huge topic:

          The overhead of a full blown operating system you have to maintain is not a trivial thing. You have to update and maintain os, drivers and applications at least and it’s directed at all purpose use in general. That means all of the above and games might or might not fit well to a handheld device. Even if it’s maintained by a third party (eg Asus) there are many many moving parts that are all purpose. This might be a dialog box with unaccessible options you have to work around or games not working with the controls you need to fix and might never (for me steredenn on steam deck). You can however literally do what you want with it.

          Compared to this a console is an optimized experience, golden cage. Things just work. Yes there might be the off chance but in general the producer has a system. 100% under their control and can test and optimize very well, which Nintendo debatably does.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            You mean like how Steam does with the Steam Deck?

            Consoles these days are basically just PCs with limited development criteria. But a much much narrower library.

            • Strider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Yes you’re right, in a way. I have much respect for valve for that.

              However the ‘non streamlinedness’ is hidden there. It’s not a closed system like a console.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m an og Nintendo hype veteran from the days of N64. This is the first where I ignored all the rumors. I am not impressed also not disappointed.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It’s kind of wild seeing Nintendo just make an upgraded version of the previous console. Even the Wii U was fairly transformative, even if not great.

      This, from the perspective of someone who isn’t huge on Nintendo, kinda feels more like a “Switch Pro” kind of thing, no?

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I think the “Switch Pro” would be the OLED model as an upgrade of the original. This thing looks brand new even if it shares a lot of similarity to the original.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Lol. I did put my money on “barely distinguishable from the Switch 1, maybe bigger”. I guess I win the betting pool.

    I’m mainly happy because I didn’t want to be tempted to support Nintendo’s lawsuit happy asses, anyway.

    If they ever release a Virtual Boy Mini, my conscience will never recover from my own hypocrisy, though.

    • Nora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I plan on buying just the console (which they usually lose money on anyways), and then leaving it in the box not connected to the Internet until a mod chip comes out.

      • b34k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t think Nintendo loses money on their consoles. With the original switch, and this switch 2, they specifically went with old and slow hardware to ensure the margins work out.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I bought a game on switch for like 40 bucks that ended up being really bad, and tried to get it refunded within about two hours of purchase, after about thirty minutes of play time. Couldn’t get the refund.

    Ever since, I was VERY slow to buy anything, because, what if it’s unexpectedly bad? I have to know I mean it, otherwise I shouldn’t buy it. I want to buy a game, not flush money down the toilet.

    So, now I kind of just don’t want a Switch 2.

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      My girlfriend accidentally bought Minecraft because she wanted to check out whether she could pay via PayPal. There are no further confirmations. Also no refund possible even though she hasn’t even installed it once. If I could be bothered, I’d sue, but in Germany that wouldn’t financially make sense, even though it would not be a hard case at all

      • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Where is refund of digital goods, which must be activated or linked outside of Steam possible? With valve it is purely a gesture of goodwill. If you buy a game in a store and remove the foil, you won’t get it exchanged either. In Germany, every court would laugh at you and ask you to pay for wasting their time. Maybe you should look for the mistakes yourself? After all, you are the stupid uninformed person who blindly throws your money away. Blaming the embarrassment on the store providers is a real indictment. I’m sorry, you have completely different problems if you can’t get your act together.

        • RidderSport@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Ad hominem much? The point is an issue with the declaration of will to pursue a contract. You can challenge that after the fact.

          • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            We are talking about digital goods that are generally excluded from exchange. Even my little niece knows that. So lazy, stupid customer: find out on YouTube? Better not. Find out on gaming/review websites? Better not. Just google it or read at least 1 sentence about it before buying? No, better not. Buying blindly and then lining up like a toddler because you weren’t able to think about it thoroughly beforehand instead of buying blindly.

            Use your brain first. Think about the money first. Be smarter beforehand. Get active before… Publishers always tell better stories… Which retailer doesn’t do that…_

            • shneancy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              aaaand another asshole blocked. if you want your comments to be read by people don’t be a dickhead

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      At the same time, the Switch is such a solid console that a hardware upgrade with full backwards compatibility* is really the best case scenario. People have wanted a bigger screen, better chip, and better joysticks since launch, and now we’ll have them!

      *the video says it’s not 100% compatible, but I’m assuming that’s for stuff like Labo and Ring Fit that need those exact joycon sizes/shapes.

    • FrodoSpark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It looks like the controllers attach to the screen magnetically, which may interfere with the sensors of Hall Effect sticks

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Hall effect sensor expert here! No, the magnets in the joycons that are used to attach to the display/body of the Switch 2 would not interfere with hall effect analog sticks.

        Two reasons:

        • The magnets are too far away (sensors are usually only sensitive to magnets within 10-12mm directly above/below)
        • The mounting/attachment magnets would be perpendicular to the magnets in the analog sticks (if you imagine the flux lines they wouldn’t cross the sensory boundary).

        Regardless, it would be trivial to place a tiny little piece of ferromagnetic blocking tape wherever necessary to prevent interference.