The content on all the communities seem different.

Why didn’t the “copycats” get the “this community name has already been taken” message?

It was bad enough at The Other Place finding one overlooked sub about one of your interests.

Now you have to find every single community in every single instance if you hope to talk about your topic?

I mean, look at this:

No Stupid [email protected]

No Stupid [email protected]

No Stupid [email protected]

No Stupid [email protected]

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t have to. You can, if you want. You have options in your life. You could always just go plant tomatoes instead. 🍅

  • Kill_joy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is how the world works. On Reddit there were multiple subs that covered the same topics, but the mods developed different cultures and vibes through moderation tactics and sub policies.

    If you want a car, there are different companies who all provide one but with different options. Same goes for ISPs, TV networks, restaurants, and schools.

    It isn’t at all a new concept and I’m not sure why people coming from reddit continue to get stuck on it. Subscribe to them all and as they mature unsub from the ones that develop into something you don’t feel like you need.

    Posting to all of them will be easier when cross posting is possible on Kbin (it is already possible on Lemmy) but developments like that often take time.


    Adding an edit as I’ve thought a bit more: I think it’s important, for those coming from reddit, to truly understand why the Fediverse exists. The intention is to be open source. To ensure that there is no single source of power. There are ‘unlimited’ options (instances, magazines, etc.) to ensure that it cannot be swayed, corrupted.

    This is why people are coming from Reddit - you are seeing what happens when one corporation has the power and sets the terms.

    I think it’s lovely to dip your toes here, ask questions, and see if you’d like to stick around. But please do understand the intention is not to be Reddit 2.0. We should not try to turn it into that.

    • MeowdyPardner@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this answer is the most accurate. People get too hung up same names on different servers. There will always be multiple versions of a community whether they have the same name on different servers or whether one of them snagged the og name and others prefixed with Real_x / True_x. Imo I like it this way better because there’s less favoritism to the one that comes first / people can’t universally squat on a community name

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the key for people who are confused about this is that it’s necessary to consider the part after the “@” to be just as much a part of the community name as the part before it. There’s no such thing as a community named “No Stupid Questions”, with no @whatever after it, because all community names inherently include that portion.

        As an alternative solution there are issues for “multireddit”-like features, this issue for Lemmy, and Kbin has one here.

  • ZagTheRaccoon@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are 5 different forums on the internet about this topic.

    You don’t have to join all or any of them. But they are each available to you.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, are you really that concerned that you might miss some random question on one of the less popular ones?

    • 314r8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an example. If there are multiple instances of a thing do I need to subscribe to all of them? The answer is yes. It’s different from Reddit but there are pro and cons.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The answer is no. You don’t NEED to subscribe to all of them. If you want to make absolutely sure you don’t miss a single thing everyone says on that topic, then maybe you do. But if you are just interested in electric cars, you can just pick the most active one of the one with the most subscribers. Even on reddit there were both /r/electriccars and /r/electricvehicles.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course you’re welcome to that opinion but it’s a fundamental design feature of the fediverse.

        There’s no central point of control. Anyone can create an instance and create their own “No stupid questions” community.

        There are obvious benefits if you’d care to consider them but if not it’s fine if the fediverse isn’t for you. There’s always reddit I guess.

        • Hangglide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is nothing stopping the fediverse from checking with other instances to see if a name is already in use. That would be a pretty cool feature to avoid a whole bunch of duplication.

          • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes there is.

            It’s decentralised. There’s no central authority.

            Even if lemmy imposed that restriction, you could just fork the code and remove it.

            • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wait, he’s got a point though: Why not something like this:

              A user wants to create a new community. He enters a name, then the system checks and informs that “the fediverse already has a community by that name +here and +here.” The user may still create this same community on this instance - or he might say, hey cool thanks, and go subscribe to (one of?) the existing ones instead.

              • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This would only help if people creating these communities were not aware that communities with the same name exist on other instances.

                Even if this feature did discourage someone from creating a new community, some other fief lord would be along shortly to create it.

                I did feel the same way about multiple communities initially, but now I’ve been here a while I realise that it’s just not a problem - just subscribe to all of them, that’s the solution.

  • RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you want them all I guess.

    Its a downside but also a power.

    For example, if No Stupid [email protected] tomorrow decides to add a rule “No Post about cats” there are still others you can subscribe to that won’t have that rule