The author may be a right-wing fellow. Nonetheless, the data he exposes are taken from official Mozilla docs.

  • darq@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ad hominem applies to arguments. The source of an argument does not affect the soundness of that argument.

    But it’s not a fallacy to question an overarching narrative based on the source. If a person keeps selectively choosing facts and twisting words to forward a specific narrative, it’s not fallacious to view what that person says with skepticism.

    Edit: Typo. Also changed “valid” to “sound”.

    • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      ad hominem: in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

      If you think his narrative is skewed and based on selectively chosen facts and twisted words, you could correct that.

      • darq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        And other people are doing that in the comments. I addressed your point about ad-hominem specifically. So your response is kinda irrelevant to what I wrote.

        People are questioning the narrative the author is painting based on their motivations. That’s different to ad-hominem.

      • stillwater@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really want to take the position that narratives can’t be skewed by the overall ethos of the author?