• bender@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not here for a debate OP, just here to post the information you promised and didn’t. As a bonus, I gave you a primary source instead of a propaganda rag!

        I’m sure other people here enjoy arguing against someone with the IQ and demeanor of a brick wall, but if I wanted that, I’ve got four right here.

        • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not here for a debate

          Sir, this is the internet.

          You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

          • bender@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

            Sir, this is the internet.

            Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

            • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Looks like you’re here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

              You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.

      • bender@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure where in posting a link about China’s massive, well-documented genocide did I say anything about my position on Guantanamo, but keep going after those straw men, you’ll beat them one of these days.

          • exscape@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

          • bender@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

            Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

            • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

              • bender@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

                • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But there won’t be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there’s far more evidence for him.

          • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you read your own source?

            The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you’re saying?