I don’t understand how Lemmy.world developers managed to surpass both Lemmy.ml and Beehaw.org instances in user activity.

  • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Beehaw seems to have already developed a plan to put everyone they do not like into predefined boxes so they can call those boxes bad and exclude them. Today they were discussing banning “pedantic” users - people asking questions in bad faith, in their opinion. This kind of subjective moderation is what is wrong with reddit. Beehaw is not even federated, last time I checked. You have to fill out a literal application to join. This is not new-user friendly. So that’s how I ended up here.

    • AnObscureTenet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does any of that make you think it’s SUPPOSED to be new user friendly?

      They don’t have to be. They also don’t have to be federated.

      • Stumbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have people not learned anything from their reddit experience? Beehaw is extremely massive fed flags. Its literally the same exact toxic behavior that the uber mods that hoarded subreddits and got off from power would have.

        Its not a good look and im shocked people support it…

        • skred@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Imagine getting tribalistic over a site which can have infinite clones and everyone can get the experience(s) they want.

          The existence of Beehaw has no material impact on you whatsoever.

          • Stumbler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didin’t get tribalistic. I just said I don’t understand. Maybe I missed the memo that said criticism and confusion is not allowed?