OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop comparing AI to a person. It’s not a person, it doesn’t do the things a person does, and it doesn’t have the rights of a person.

    And yes the laws are antiquated. We need new laws that will protect authors.

    Finally, no, you can’t just throw out all other considerations because you think AI is useful.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      and it doesn’t have the rights of a person.

      And we have determined that AI created work cannot be copyrighted - because it’s not a person. Nobody’s trying to claim that AI somehow has the rights of a person.

      But reading a bunch of books and then creating new material using the knowledge gained in those books is not copyright infringement and should be not treated as such. I can take Andy Warhol’s style and create as many advertisements as I want with it. He doesn’t own the style, nobody does.

      Why should that be any different for a company using AI? Makes no sense to me.

      You have been duped into thinking copyright is protecting authors when really copyright primarily exists to protect companies like Disney.

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        For clarity’s sake, the original intent behind copyright was definitely to protect authors and thereby foster creativity, but corporations like Disney have lobbied very successfully over the years to prevent original works from becoming public domain.

        Meanwhile, in classic fashion, those same companies have taken public domain works and turned them into ludicrously successful IPs!

        I argue that this is a positive aspect of capitalism that our governments have unduly suppressed in favor of corporate sponsors (further solidified by an increasing legal allowance of such sponsorships), and that we should return to a more reasonable timeframe for full exclusivity.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well copyright certainly isn’t protecting authors if big corporations can use their works without paying for them. That’s the whole point.

    • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure about that at all. At what point does a computer program become intelligent enough to not have human rights but have some cognition of fair use.

      I think it needs to be really hashed out by someone who understands both copyright law and data warehouses, and some programming. It’s a sparse field for sure but we need someone equipped for it.

      Because I don’t think it’s as linear as you’re describing it.