• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    So providing a fine-tuned model shouldn’t either.

    I didn’t mean in terms of providing. I meant that if someone provided a base model, someone took that, built upon it, then used it for a harmful purpose - of course the person modified it should be liable, not the base provider.

    It’s like if someone took a version of Linux, modified it, then used that modified version for an illegal act - you wouldn’t go after the person who made the unmodified version.

    • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You wouldn’t necessarily punish the person that modified Linux either, you’d punish the person that uses it for a nefarious purpose.

      Important distinction is the intention to deceive, not that the code/model was modified to be able to be used for nefarious purposes.