YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t think they know how many watch their videos with adblockers or third party clients?

    I highly doubt they accept views from third party clients as valid ad views or probably views at all since that would likely make abuse easier.

    • boywar3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It still goes to active user counts though. There will still be a footprint left by any view and that can be marketed as “we have X million users daily!”

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I doubt the really big advertisers (the only ones that maybe can negotiate) think that’s enough statistics.

        • boywar3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Again, the point is that those accounts are still users that can be pointed out as such for all to see. Remember: a youtube account is just a Google account.

          One could argue that youtube is a highly effective loss leader - people get into the Google ecosystem because of making an account to subscribe to their favorite content creators. Now Google has data they can sell, and metrics for advertisers to go “I see 18-30 year old white guys who watch things about X are likely to respond positively to things about Y.” The algorithm, even without advertisements, is constantly building a profile of every user.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t use third party clients but I thought that the entire point of them was that you don’t use an account.

            • boywar3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              There is still a footprint of “person is watching X, then they go to Y” with or without an account by my understanding.

              Its less valuable data, sure, but it all feeds thr algorithm

              • lud@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Maybe, it would depend on how the front ends work with how they get content and so on.

                Either way I doubt they care much about that data. I would bet they would bet they would rather get rid of those users.

                • boywar3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The effort/cost expended to go after a tiny group of people vs the amount of money generated/saved from stopping them was (and probably still is) not worth it. There just aren’t that many people who use 3rd party services without accounts.