By Jeremy Hsu on September 24, 2024


Popular smart TV models made by Samsung and LG can take multiple snapshots of what you are watching every second – even when they are being used as external displays for your laptop or video game console.

Smart TV manufacturers use these frequent screenshots, as well as audio recordings, in their automatic content recognition systems, which track viewing habits in order to target people with specific advertising. But researchers showed this tracking by some of the world’s most popular smart TV brands – Samsung TVs can take screenshots every 500 milliseconds and LG TVs every 10 milliseconds – can occur when people least expect it.

“When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,” says Yash Vekaria at the University of California, Davis. Samsung and LG did not respond to a request for comment.

Vekaria and his colleagues connected smart TVs from Samsung and LG to their own computer server. Their server, which was equipped with software for analysing network traffic, acted as a middleman to see what visual snapshots or audio data the TVs were uploading.

They found the smart TVs did not appear to upload any screenshots or audio data when streaming from Netflix or other third-party apps, mirroring YouTube content streamed on a separate phone or laptop or when sitting idle. But the smart TVs did upload snapshots when showing broadcasts from the TV antenna or content from an HDMI-connected device.

The researchers also discovered country-specific differences when users streamed the free ad-supported TV channel provided by Samsung or LG platforms. Such user activities were uploaded when the TV was operating in the US but not in the UK.

By recording user activity even when it’s coming from connected laptops, smart TVs might capture sensitive data, says Vekaria. For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

Customers can opt out of such tracking for Samsung and LG TVs. But the process requires customers to either enable or disable between six and 11 different options in the TV settings.

“This is the sort of privacy-intrusive technology that should require people to opt into sharing their data with clear language explaining exactly what they’re agreeing to, not baked into initial setup agreements that people tend to speed through,” says Thorin Klosowski at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital privacy non-profit based in California.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2449198-smart-tvs-take-snapshots-of-what-you-watch-multiple-times-per-second/ (paywall!!)

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    LOL “if it was opt-in, no one would do it!”

    no fucking shit. there is nothing worth watching that i would buy a smart tv for

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      One issue that has come up recently in discussions on here is that it’s hard to get dumb TVs or computer monitors in large format in 2024.

      Not impossible, but surprisingly difficult. I went looking for a large computer monitor for some user who wanted a large one. I eventually found an older one on Amazon still for sale, but it’s not that easy to get large computer monitors, which I think is part of what drives people to use smart TVs as computer monitors.

      You can get projectors, but that’s not what everyone’s after.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        A smart tv without an internet connection is usually close enough to a dumb TV. It’s not like your TV needs regular security updates so leaving it off your home network is fine.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          I do not know how true it is, but I’ve heard that some of them will create a mesh network if your neighbor has the same brand and it’s connected to the internet.

          I’ve always meant to look into it but I have big dumb TVs that work for now.

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Open the tv and rip out the antenna. Y’all already forgot the classic secret agent trope of checking the hotel room for bugs? Now we all get to play that game!

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Nowadays the antenna is often embedded into the pcb, so no way to rip it out other than scraping off the traces

              • flappy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Google part numbers (if they aren’t scratched off/lasered off/ epoxied). Once you’ve found the ethernet controller, you can short out the pins, or yeet it off the board.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      if it was opt-in, no one would do it!

      Which should be telling them that not only does no one want it, but maybe just maybe we already paid for your fucking TV. Either raise the price or stop being so fucking goddamn greedy to the point that you force us to make the government force you to stop.

      Of course the bought and paid for US government won’t, but hopefully EU governments will.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    These are criminal violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Jail the motherfucking felon CEOs!

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Worse than that, they have gave free speech to corporations, and now that includes doing nearly anything involving communication or spending money.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          You know what’s really fucked up? The concept of “corporate personhood” that Citizens United depends upon was invented wholesale by a goddamn clerk! The Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. decision itself didn’t actually address the issue; the clerk just wrote a headnote “assuming” that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment applied to corporations for ~reasons~ and subsequent courts treated as if it were gospel.

    • billbasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      So LG and Samsung likely have tons of illegal (copyright) content on their servers then? Ownership is 9/10ths of the law so they say. That’s gotta be exabytes

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    Imagine the amount of bandwidth and energy saved, if they didn’t do any of this bullshit.

    They are essentially using someone else’s money to get themselves more money. Fuck these people!

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      I complained about shit like this more than a decade ago and everyone just laughed and said ‘Oh they’ll never do anything like that’

      You get what you fucking deserve

      • areyouevenreal@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        For one people don’t actually have much choice if you want to buy a television. Most TVs are smart TVs now, so you are pretending we have a choice here. I have managed to avoid buying one, but only because I don’t buy televisions.

        Would you like it if I blamed you for getting spied on by Microsoft because you use Windows? Switching to Linux is easier than finding a TV that isn’t smart and actually has decent specifications.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    awful ethics aside what a disgusting waste of processing power. software already barely runs

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    “When a user connects their laptop via HDMI just to browse stuff on their laptop on a bigger screen by using the TV as a ‘dumb’ display, they are unsuspecting of their activity being screenshotted,”

    But if you never connected the TV to the internet, it’s not able to upload anything right?

  • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    For example, it might record if people are browsing for baby products or other personal items.

    Don’t mind baby products and dildos or whatever.

    They could see bank activity and even login credentials when someone is temporarily displaying their own passwords.

    This basically ignores all security measures regarding everything. Sensitive communication, company secrets and so on.

    That’s fucking seriously huge. What the fuck?!

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Something doesn’t add up. How can a TV take 100 Screenshots of 4k content per second? No wifi has that bandwidth. No embedded processor has that capacity.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yea I don’t believe it, that’s some processor intensive streaming. My security camera feeds can’t even do that. 100fps is crazy for streaming. Are we sure these “screenshots” aren’t just anonymous metric gatherings like video codecs and resolution?

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m with you, I think it’s probably BS. But I suppose it could be taking highly compressed low resolution snapshots.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I agree. I’m the OP, but not the author of this article. I do believe this author doesn’t know what he is talking about. After looking at the study, it seems it does record data at 500ms interval. However, only in intervals of 1 time per minute 8kB of data is sent back, meaning its only some kind of meta data.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Yeah. My Samsung claws my firewall like a squirrel trapped in a box. It intensifies on certain hours of the day. I’m quite sure it also tries to send what devices are connected and what filenames are in attached memory sticks. Maybe also some media file checksums.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Do your firewall rules allow you to block your tv’s telemetry, while allowing you to still use the internet on it? If so, would you mind sharing how you did it?