• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    My car isn’t driverless, but I as the driver have less control than ever before.

    It’s an EV, and it will not shift to drive or reverse if the charging cable is attached.

    Great for preventing me from destroying a charger. Terrible for getting away from someone trying to mug me.

    Far too much of the safety features these days assume an environment in which all harm is accidental. This comes at the cost of safety in environments where someone is trying to harm another person.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the seatbelt argument all over again. The safety features protect people in the majority of scenarios. While there may be scenarios where it does more harm than good, they are rare. You’re much safer with the safety feature.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think there is a car where the seat belt is tied to anything besides a little notification beep. Seems like a different situation if the “safety” feature dictates how the car is used.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      You don’t complain about having to open your door or start the engine when escaping a threat.

      Having to unplug a cable during a very specific, imagined threat seems like a niche problem.