L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoYouTube TV urged to drop '$600 less than cable' ad claimwww.lightreading.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkYouTube TV urged to drop '$600 less than cable' ad claimwww.lightreading.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarehightrix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoCable should be vastly cheaper than streaming since it is double dipping on payment models. Paying for access and then also paying through watching ads means cable should be half or less what the current rate is.
minus-squareBilliam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoStreaming platforms double-dip too. They collect and sell your useage metrics while also either charging you for access or showing you ads.
Cable should be vastly cheaper than streaming since it is double dipping on payment models. Paying for access and then also paying through watching ads means cable should be half or less what the current rate is.
Streaming platforms double-dip too. They collect and sell your useage metrics while also either charging you for access or showing you ads.