• SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Now we just need to use the user information to check their net worth, and if it’s above a certain amount it needs to hover a quest marker above that person. I’m curious to see how long before privacy laws get stronger.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    A company called Clearview AI broke that unwritten rule and developed a powerful facial recognition system using billions of images scraped from social media. Primarily, Clearview sells its product to law enforcement. Clearview has also explored a pair of smart glasses that would run its facial recognition technology. The company signed a contract with the U.S. Air Force on a related study.

    Just another reason to not post all your images to social media. Share with family/friends who care but thats it.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Right?! That is all it takes to save your privacy is just not having social media but noone is willing to do that.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        The main concern I have is unavoidably having my picture taken. Say I go to a family gathering, of course they will take my picture if it’s a big event. They then will probably share it everywhere. I can’t reasonably say “don’t post this picture on the internet” they probably will.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The project is designed to raise awareness of what is possible with this technology.

    This has nothing to do with smart glasses, and everything to do with surveillance capitalism. You could do the same thing with a smartphone, or any camera + computer. All this does is highlight how everyones most sensitive data has been aggregated by numerous corporations and is available to anyone who will pay for it. There was a time when Capitalism used to equate itself as the “free” and privacy preserving antithesis to Soviet style communist surveillance, yet no KGB agent ever had access to a system with 1/100th the surveillance capabilities that 21st century capitalism now sells freely for profit. If you need proof, a couple of college students were able to create every stalking victims worst nightmare.

    • vzq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I mean sort of.

      It does mean that walking around with smart glasses will have people potentially reacting to you like you are waving a recording smartphone in their face.

      Which is not great for product adoption, if you get my drift.

      • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Soon smartglasses will look like regular glasses though. Miniaturisation isn’t about to stop.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Pretty much no phone is directed at everyone else’s face all the time, that alone is the huge difference. It’s the differences between someone using their phone and someone actively holding it upright to record the crowd. Surveillance cameras might be out there too but they aren’t sighted by everyone (different by country, some even have to deleted after 24h, unless there was a crime).

      People quickly would tell you to stop recoding, if you’d hold up your phone all the time, even in situations where you’re closer to each other, like in public transport.

      • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Im sure you could find a usb c camera that could easily be obscured or pinned to a lapel or otherwise disguised for cheaper than the price of a pair of smart glasses, or even just wear your phone on a lanyard around your neck with the screen facing your chest. People might think its weird but noone is going to second guess it unless your phone is in your hands actively pointing at them.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Apple already demonstrated that you can still get pretty darn close from eyes and hair. Combine that with a bit of logic (There is a 40% chance this is Sally Smith but she also lives three streets over and works on that street) and you still have very good odds.

      Well… unless you are black, brown, or asian. Since the facial recognition tech is heavily geared toward white people because tech bros.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Facial recognition works better on white people because, mathematically, they provide more information in real world camera use cases.

        Darker skin reflects less light and dark contrast is much more difficult for cameras to capture unless you have significantly higher end equipment.

      • Seraph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s literally the first line of the article you guys, fucking read it instead of speculating:

        A pair of students at Harvard have built…

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    If I could get glasses that told me “that guy enthusiastically greeting you by name right now is Marty, you last met him in university in such-and-such class eight years ago” I would pay any amount of money for that.

    “Doxing people” and “recognizing people” have a pretty blurry border.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Recording and even more so profiling people without their explicit consent is completely not okay.

          • andyburke@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Stay home. 🤷‍♂️ When you are in public, people can see you. You don’t get to tell me what I can and can’t look at or take a picture of. (Note that I said this was complicated, and this is where the complications start - I should be able to record you in public if I am not specifically monitoring or harassing you, or trying to obtain pictures of things under your clothes, for instance, which IS a violation of your privacy. But just walking around in public recording things? You can’t take my rights away just because you think you should have complete privacy even when out in public.)

    • Eggyhead@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Imagine never having to go through “the effort” of just knowing someone.

      I’m starting to get a feel for the “society is fucked” crowd.

      Edit: I’m leaving this up because y’all are making good points.

      • astrsk@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        That’s not what they’re saying. Nuance is important here.

        Some people have a legitimate condition where they can’t remember faces. Moreover there’s a lot of different brains out there and some people have very poor memory when it comes to other people’s names or other details, especially if they’re introverted and have anxiety in social situations. It can be helpful to have reminders, like keeping birthdays attached to people in your contacts so your calendar can remind you when it is someone’s birthday. Everyone is different and what you call “effort” might be a physical or mental deficiency or differently wired brain for someone else.