Now, the words and figures “with the exception of articles 2-c, 4-c, 5-c, 12-c, 13-c, 14-c, 17-c, 21-c and 22-c” have been removed from the Regulation, i.e. everyone will be recognised as fit under the “controversial” articles:

  • 2-c – clinically treated tuberculosis;
  • 4-c – viral hepatitis with minor functional impairment;
  • 5-c – asymptomatic HIV carrier;
  • 12-c - slowly progressive and non-progressive with minor functional impairment and rare exacerbations of anaemia, blood clotting disorders, purpura, haemorrhagic conditions, other diseases of the blood and haematopoietic organs, and some disorders involving the immune mechanism;
  • 13-c - diseases of the endocrine system with minor functional disorders;
  • 14-c - mild, short-term, painful manifestations of mental disorders;
  • 17-c - neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders with moderate or short-term manifestations, with an asthenic state;
  • 21-c – slowly progressive diseases of the central nervous system with minor functional disorders;
  • 22-c – episodic and paroxysmal disorders, except for epilepsy, with minor impairment of organ and system functions.
    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      712·
      1 year ago

      I would rather die than kill. If you tell me to kill I will kill you first to limit the amount of total death.

      This is the ultimate utilitarian take on the ethics of the situation you dunce.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        146·
        1 year ago

        You say you’d rather die than kill, and then in the very next line you threaten to kill me for telling you something.

        You need to read up on what being a “conscientious objector” is actually about, or whatever it is you’re going for here, because your philosophy is incoherent.

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          910·
          1 year ago

          Believe it or not, this would completely cripple military power across the board. Overall, resulting in less death than the death of the white collar pencil pushers that command troops.

          Sure you can be the bootlicker that shoots people for funsies, don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

          Edit: where tf did I threaten you specifically?..

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            76·
            1 year ago

            You said:

            If you tell me to kill I will kill you first

            Even if you just mean it as a “generic” you, you’re still making it quite clear that you’re more willing to kill than you are to die.

            You realize there are other options than “follow orders to kill someone” and “kill the guy who gave you an order”, right?

            don’t come crying to me when you get drafted

            I’m Canadian.

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              64·
              1 year ago

              Definitely generic “you.” But if you plan on leading troops we can make it happen?

              Edit: Honestly cute you think Canada wouldn’t follow USA into the next great drafted war

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                35·
                1 year ago

                But if you plan on leading troops we can make it happen?

                So right after saying you didn’t threaten me personally, you expand your threat to cover me personally.