• Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    It makes sense for AI to do this kind of work.

    But companies should hire editors to verify the results, including someone with local cultural knowledge.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Does it? They had people writing articles in Spanish, knowing their Spanish-speaking audience and what would appeal to them. Now it’s just English articles translated into Spanish. Badly.

      • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What?? You mean there’s more to translating media than scraping together the literal translation of one language to another and calling it done??

        Nah, those Spanish folks will totally get all the English idioms and phrasing they’ve likely never heard of, and will totally not be confused over the piss poor machine translation effort

          • scottyjoe9@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            To be fair, translation engines like deepl.com do handle idioms pretty well compared to google translate. It probably depends on the idiom and the languages though. But even deepl is nowhere near perfect. Fine for random stuff to be understood but not good for a professional news website.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Aren’t the English articles already written by an ai anyway? Doesn’t it make sense to have a more homogeneous chain of production?

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Have you not been paying attention to AI over the last year? It can easily go beyond just translating word for word. This isn’t Google Translate anymore.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          How sure are you that idioms which don’t even have good translations will be accurately translated by the AI? How sure are you that there won’t be cultural misunderstandings which go beyond translation?

      • Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Gizmodo is a global tech news site, not a local news site. The majority of articles on the site are not region specific.

        It makes sense to save costs by translating the articles instead of writing separate articles. The local editors can improve the quality of the translated articles, adding or modifying parts to appeal Spanish-speaking audience.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          English is a region-specific language as much as Spanish is. A huge amount of the globe speaks Spanish and much of it shares a culture with significant differences from the English-speaking world and thus different interests.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not to take away from your point, but even the English speaking world can have significant differences among its regions.

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The local editors can improve the quality of the translated articles, adding or modifying parts to appeal Spanish-speaking audience.

          That assumes those local editors will be given any time to take on that extra workload of sorting through whatever translational errors the AI has done.

          Even if an AI accurately translates the article text word for wrord, literal translation does not often equal accurate translation.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      you wouldn’t be saying this if you were impacted by this. ai translation is no where near at the same level as actual work done by localisers

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you sure about that? With the advances to AI in the last year, something like that seems trivial

      • Cloudless ☼@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I will say this if I were impacted by this. And I will learn to use AI as a tool for my advantage.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    Next week’s headline will be something like, “Gizmodo readership drops 46% as garbled, incoherent, AI-generated content floods formerly-useful news website.”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former Gizmodo writer Matías S. Zavia publicly mentioned the layoffs, which took place via video call on August 29, in a social media post.

    Earlier this summer, Gizmodo began publishing AI-generated articles in English without informing or involving its editorial staff.

    The stories were found to contain multiple factual inaccuracies, leading the Gizmodo union to criticize the practice as unethical.

    For Spanish-speaking audiences seeking news about science, technology, and Internet culture, the loss of original reporting from Gizmodo en Español is potentially a major blow.

    Subtle errors, mistranslations, and lack of cultural knowledge can impair the quality of automatically translated content.

    But with so many media companies chasing revenue through SEO manipulations and AI-written filler, it’s unlikely that we’ll see the end of this apparently cost-cutting AI trend soon.


    The original article contains 523 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a little dance called capitalism:

      1. Company becomes publicly traded.
      2. Shareholders invest in the company.
      3. The company aims to maximize profit.
      4. Growth eventually slows down because almost everyone who could use the company’s services already does.
      5. Shareholders expect returns on their investment.
      6. To increase revenue, the company must either raise prices for customers or reduce operating expenses.
      • sacredbirdman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        this plus:

        1. For many companies the majority of operating expenses are related to employees, so they will try to resist raising wages, preferably cutting them and/or firing people (also, union busting)
        2. Product quality will suffer
        3. They’ll try to skirt regulations and lobby to overturn them
        4. In capitalism there’s no such thing as enough when it comes to ROI so we go back to 6.
    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ideally, she would be trained for a new job when those jobs went away. But we just let people suffer under capitalism.