• palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah, but then they have to pay someone to maintain it. And low though that cost may be, it’s precisely the sort of thing that C-levels like to cut when they feel like pretending that they actually do something.

    It’s a hard thing for a C-level’s ego to set something up that they know someone else is going to cut later, or worse that they might be the one to “have to” cut it.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They have to pay someone to manage the account in the first place. No reason that worker can’t do both.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Typing in a box on a website provided by someone else can be done by practically anyone, even the boss themselves at a pinch. Heck, some of them love doing that.

        Maintaining a server (or a service on a server) requires someone with more skills, which generally costs more money.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Some smart entrepreneur could offer a Mastodon-server-in-a-box service, where companies only pay hosting fees for company-name.social and a social network employee.