• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Apple’s decision to disable the feature for U.K. users could well be the only reasonable response at this point

    Hard disagree. The most reasonable response would be to refuse to comply, organize, and fight it in court. But that would cost them money. And they don’t care about their users that much.

    E: Meta says they will not comply

  • drop_and_run@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Troubling precedent, but I expect no one used this anyways. Anybody who needs this would be smart enough to know not to trust so proprietary a device and service.

    Given how readily Apple has rolled over for law enforcement in the past loudly Apple has opposed working with law enforcement in the past, only for devices to be magically unlocked anyways, this is (probably) just security theater.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Do you have citations for “Apple has rolled over for law enforcement in the past”? I’m wondering if this is country-specific.

      Fortunately you can still back up your devices locally, and store your photos locally, and these backups can be encrypted.

      • drop_and_run@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Apple-FBI encryption dispute

        My recollection was erroneous, as I can’t (easily) find evidence of them rolling over. But the devices in question still got unlocked, so in the end it didn’t matter whether Apple (openly or surreptitiously) cooperated.