• thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that AI work should not have copyright protection. Even with human intervention it still collects data, without expressed permission, from numerous sources.

    Generative AI models could be trained using only on public domain and royalty free images. Should the output of those be eligible for copyright, but not if they also had unlicensed training data?

    It seems there two separate arguments being conflated in this debate. One is whether using copyrighted works as AI training data is fair use. The other is whether creative workers should be protected from displacement by AI.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Royalty free” is not the same as public domain, most “royalty free” images still need to be licensed for particular uses and come with other restrictions. The only thing royalty free means is that the copyright owner doesn’t demand a cut of each sale you make of whatever you used it in.