#1 is in UK.
#2 Could have easily been done legally.
repressive legal measures taken by universities
Which they can only do because they didn’t do the protests legally.
#3 is about the same as #2.
None of these are environmental, and has absolutely zero saying on the headline that claim:
Europe Criminalizes Environmental Protest
And it doesn’t disprove that these protests could have been arranged legally. There are reasons why we have legal frameworks for protests. One of the reasons is that protests need to be peaceful. Violent protests are NOT democratic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
#1 is in UK.
#2 Could have easily been done legally.
Which they can only do because they didn’t do the protests legally.
#3 is about the same as #2.
None of these are environmental, and has absolutely zero saying on the headline that claim:
And it doesn’t disprove that these protests could have been arranged legally. There are reasons why we have legal frameworks for protests. One of the reasons is that protests need to be peaceful. Violent protests are NOT democratic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
Peaceful protest has literally never accomplished anything without the credible threat of violence, you are delusional