• 🖖USS-Ethernet@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The amount of downvotes on comments trying to help people not get price gouged and comments supporting these subscription price increases shows me just how many corporate shills are actually out there. No wonder these corps keep getting away with this bullshit.

    Edit: Wow so many people took personal offense to this…almost like it they know it’s true but are afraid to admit it. Everyone is hurting financially right now, some more than others. Yet year over year, the prices keep going up even with record inflation and record profits. Keep shilling folks, enjoy emptying your wallets for the millionaires while you struggle.

    • BaldrOdinson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s surprising to me. First moment I’ve thought maybe Lemmy is a worse place to be. Is there really that many astroturfing trolls here? Yikes.

      • Ado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can afford $13/month on my income and watch YT on a daily basis, much more than any other streaming service by a wide margain. Does that somehow make me an astroturfing troll?

    • zefiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ya how dare people actually pay for a platform that hosts billions of videos and streams to billions of users essentially lag free and is actually decent and shares revenue with it’s content creators. /s

      Things cost money. You don’t have to be a corporate shill to not expect everything to be free, you just have to be an adult.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get that, but the vast majority of content creators seem to make their money with sponsorships or their own ads, so most of what google is doing is content distribution, not creation. Which makes the amount of money they want for that seem ridiculous when pretty much every other streaming service that produces high profile and expensive shows themselves is way cheaper.

        This feels like your supermarket requiring entrance fees in addition to you having to pay for stuff you actually buy.

        • zefiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok? And? They aren’t a charity and don’t owe you free video hosting services.

          EDIT: I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren’t entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted. Lmao how old are the people here?

          • mrmanager@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No but I’m not going to pay Google for anything. It’s obscene to give them even more money.

            • zefiax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Whether you think that service is worth it or not is up to you.

              But don’t act like you have some moral high ground here and that people who are actually paying for a service that you are stealing from and a service that actually shares revenue with it’s content creators and encourages independent creators are just corporate shills.

              Some of us are adults and realize things cost money and not entitled children that expect everything for free.

              • dezmd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                And some of us are adults that don’t have your innate need to wield your moral high ground like a smug pedantic asshole.

                  • dezmd@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And yet that’s obivously not what this thread’s context was before you started self-jerking to moral superiority.

                    Have some self awareness.

                    This isn’t a Wendys Drive Thru.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not going to defend the price increase, but a lot of comments in here are just aimless hatred of the idea of paying anything, ever.

      Pound for pound, YouTube Premium has been a decent deal at $10. Has been. This is pushing it, but there’s a lot of comments that seem absolutely indignant at the idea of paying YouTube period (and by extension the content creators).

      There’s got to be some room for nuance here. The internet is plagued by advertising and paywalls, yes, but it can also not exist without them, so we find some middle ground.

      • MagicalPanda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using the internet for over 24 years. I can tell you that the internet can survive without ads or paywalls. Ads and paywalls are a product of greed. Ads are way more efficient these days but many used to take up so much memory. I remember when AdBlock or whatever it was called came out. It made browsing the internet smoother.

        • atomWood@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only way the internet can survive without ads or paywalls is for the person/business hosting the content to pay for everything out of pocket.

          A platform like YouTube could never exist without some form of revenue. I understand that there are small platforms out there, such as PeerTube, but they will never be comparable to the scale of YouTube without some form of revenue. Sure, people could grow PeerTube by spinning up their own instances, but then they need to provide their own hardware and storage. At which point you’re spending just as much, or likely more, than you would on a subscription service.

          • variants@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think its possible it will just be slow and requires people to sacrifice a bit just like we are trying to do with lemmy. maybe find a different route for ads like how Brave the browser does it where it give the user the choice to see ads and give them and the content creator a cut if they agree to it, not that I trust that browser but its an interesting concept