One of the men goes for her phone. The other grabs at her hands. Ozturk screams. Shock and fear ripple through her voice. Two masked women join them, tugging at her backpack, peeling the straps from her shoulders. “I’m going somewhere, I need to call someone,” she pleads. “We’re the police. Relax,” one of the men says in response.

They surround her. Then, one by one, they pull their neck gaiters up to cover their faces. “You don’t look like police,” a voice off screen says. “Why are you hiding your faces?” The questions continue, but the figures don’t respond. Instead, they cuff Ozturk, cross the street, and put her in an unmarked SUV. She is gone.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look at their body language.

    These aren’t law enforcement professionals detaining a suspect.

    These are Nazi Brown Shirt thugs ganging up on a fucking PhD student.

    This country is nosediving HARD. Arm yourselves. I would never allow plain-clothed thugs to push me into an unmarked van and take me to a secondary location. You are fighting for your life at that point for all you know.

    • blaggle42@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      I want to respond with something. But everything I write is so fucking dark and violent. Here goes, I’ll try again:

      If I were in Nazi Germany, and I saw this go down- a Jew or disabled or protester getting disappeared- and these Nazi brown shirts were shot and killed, or beaten to a pulp with metal bars, fucking stomped to death, I think it would be just.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As much as I agree, resisting is likely going to escalate the situation beyond what most people are willing to deal with.

      Face it, very few people have the knowledge and skill required to even put up a fight against anyone that is prepared for that encounter.

      I get why the victim here didn’t really fight back. I get why she let them take her away. I understand the fear she was probably feeling in that moment, and it can be paralysing for someone who isn’t prepared to fight for their life and doesn’t have the knowledge, skill, or experience required to handle the situation.

      To be clear: I’m not saying this victim is dumb, inexperienced, or lacks general life experience, I would argue quite the opposite, in fact. The problem is that they don’t have the knowledge, skill, and experience with confrontations. I’m certain, beyond any doubt, that this person was very intelligent, skilled and experienced; just not with physical confrontation.

      This is shameful behavior. Why did they feel the need to ambush a bookworm? Not to insult them so all but they are clearly more of an intellectual person than a combative person.

      Disclaimer: I’m not American, I’m just empathetic to those that get disappeared in the middle of the day by people wearing all black without so much as a badge being flashed.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a tough call honestly. So far it doesn’t seem like they are killing the people they take. If the person was armed, and tries to use it to defend themselves, they very likely will get killed. As other have commented, these appear to be basically thugs. Likely with less training then police officers, and certainly with less oversight. So people need to choose what they want to avoid most. Death, or incarceration with a chance of getting out. I would hate to have to make that choice myself.

      • tankfox@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        The killing starts when they become more confident that there won’t be any consequences for their actions.

    • smoresrock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nazi? You, sir, are ridiculous and have no sense of nationalism. Hamas, who would not have your back or mine, is quite obviously the problem in Palestine, and this PhD student (as if that makes a difference) is supporting the wrong side. The US is revoking visas of Hamas supporters. Hence, she’s being detained to ultimately have her visa revoked. What part of that aren’t you following?

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We have due process in this country. If you don’t like that, then fuck off.

        • smoresrock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Lmao. Couple things: 1) relax, and 2) she wasn’t incarcerated; her visa was revoked. That doesn’t require due process, since they’re discretionary.

          Take it easy, man.

          • uselessRN@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Her visa was revoked for what? By what judge? Why was she detained? You claim she’s “wrong”. By whose standard? Trump? He’s the ultimate deciding force? What happens when you’re wrong? Can we revoke your citizenship?

            • smoresrock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Rapid fire over here. Okay, here goes:

              • For being a Hamas supporter.
              • By no judge. Due process is not mandatory in this case.
              • She was detained because she’s a Hamas supporter.
              • By The standard designated to terrorist supporters.
              • Yes, Trump. He is our president after all. Commander in Chief and head of the executive branch
              • The policies put in place against terrorists and supporters thereof is the “ultimate deciding force.”
              • What happens if I’m wrong about what?
              • How are citizenships revoked? If there’s a way, and I meet those conditions, then yes.
      • uselessRN@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nazism isn’t nationalism. Loving your country doesn’t mean you silence those that disagree with you and “detain” anyone that doesn’t look like you.

        • smoresrock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Except that’s not what’s going on here.

          Radical Islam groups are designated terrorists. It just so happens that this administration is buckling down and following through with their word on revoking visas to those who support such groups. This is what America wants; the numbers don’t lie. You guys are just not used to the follow through.

          • uselessRN@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            More people voted for someone besides Trump. If no one was an option, they would have won in a landslide. Where is the proof she is a terrorist? What if the next president labels maga hats terrorists? You’re deported and no one will ever know.