He probably means that a Ukranian AA interceptor either itself landed on the shop, or knocked the Russian missile off course causing the incident.
Completely ignoring that either scenario would have never happened if there was no Russian missile to begin with. Nor that the Russians consider civilian targets good use for their munitions.
The argument is in bad faith, I would suggest down voting the tankies and moving on.
Ukraine has been slowly losing Western support for months, so there’s definitely something to gain.
It’s far more likely to be another equipment malfunction (I’m guessing infrared targeting locked onto the wrong heat signature or something stupid?), just like the market strike.
Ukr gains nothing from false flags, but go off and tell us how it was a false flag no question
He probably means that a Ukranian AA interceptor either itself landed on the shop, or knocked the Russian missile off course causing the incident.
Completely ignoring that either scenario would have never happened if there was no Russian missile to begin with. Nor that the Russians consider civilian targets good use for their munitions.
The argument is in bad faith, I would suggest down voting the tankies and moving on.
Targeting of military targets is entirely valid. It’s a war. You hit military targets. That’s sort of how war works.
Ukraine has been slowly losing Western support for months, so there’s definitely something to gain.
It’s far more likely to be another equipment malfunction (I’m guessing infrared targeting locked onto the wrong heat signature or something stupid?), just like the market strike.