Shouldn’t it be the default and not require the suspect/subject to actually ask for one? Has there ever been any attempt to make that the norm in any countries? I think the only question should be “do you have your own lawyer you like to use, or are you happy enough with the court-appointed one?”

I’m not even sure opting out should be allowed, but I’m open to hearing reasons why that would be a bad system, or indeed a worse system than the one most countries seem to have now. So many miscarriages of justice could have been easily avoided.

  • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The 5th amendment only applies before arrest and during court. You still have the right to silence after arrest, that is a common law right.

    Salinas volunteered to go to the police station (he wasn’t arrested), so he had no common law right to silence.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Of course what you wrote is not what it actually says in the Bill of Rights.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      That’s close to what Scalia/Thomas argued but that’s not what the majority opinion says. They explicitly say you always have the ability to plead the fifth and have it not be used as evidence. And it’s true. You never have to self incriminate. But their argument is you have to make it explicit, which is frankly dumb.