• You999@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The problem with fuels made from electricity is that pesky thing called thermodynamics. If an efuel was developed that was more efficient than electricity then we’d be able to use it to produce more electricity than we put in.

    • Nighed@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lots of fuels (like petrol) are a lot more energy dense than out best batteries. If we can synthesize fuels like that just using electricity as an energy source (that can be generated from renewables) then you have a carbon free dense store of energy that can be used to power a vehicle for a long distance without refueling.

      The problem with these (fuel cells etc) is that the conversation rate is inefficient, wasting a lot of energy. As we are not using 100% renewable energy this means carbon is being released still.

      If we had an entirely renewable energy grid (with oversupply when sunny/windy etc) then those energy losses would not matter.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      You avoid the giant, expensive battery though. People are obsessed with efficiency in a self-defeating way.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        People are obsessed with efficiency because it’s the only metric that matters. We have a finite amount of resources on this planet and efficiency is the only way we can make it last. If you aren’t a ‘save the planet’ type of person then efficiency still matters because it’s directly correlated with cost.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Better ban solar panels cause they’re only 15-20% efficient. /s

          • You999@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            11 months ago

            You are comparing different efficiencies. Solar panels are 15% to 20% efficient at converting light into energy. As far as I’m aware every Efuel being developed (and every hydrocarbon fuel for that matter) has a 0% efficiency at converting light into energy but if I am mistaken please do correct me.

            • PlatinumSf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              In a completely technical sense the hydrocarbon fuel was at one time produced from light energy (dead plants) but that’s taking your point and being pedantic since the “efficiency” of the conversation is probably astronomically low when you account for the loses sustained by whatever lifeform died and became said hydrocarbons.

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              11 months ago

              E-fuels are made from solar power. It is not anywhere near 0%. Also, clearly efficiency is not “the only metric that matters.”

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                11 months ago

                No they are made from electricity, and that electricity is made by solar panels (sometimes).

                Any form of conversion means losing energy.

                • Hypx@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  BEVs require conversion steps too. Not to mention the cost and energy needed to build them in the first place. They are nearly as efficient as their advocates think.

                  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    An EV’s pollution is recovered after 25 000km compared to an ICE.

                    This is including the battery and being completely powered by coal power plants.

                    The conversion steps for any EV is much less then any other form of fuel, because all those fuels usually convert to electricity somewhere in the line.

                    You just really like bringing up debunked arguments, do you?