• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Copyleft is the only valid argument here. Everything else falls under fair use as it is a derivative work.

    • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I scrape a bunch of data, put it in a database, and then make that database queryable only using obscure, arcane prompts: Is that a derivative work permitted under fair use?

      Because if you can get chatgpt to spit out raw training data with the right prompt, it can essentially be used as a database of copyrighted stuff that is very difficult to query.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No because that would be distribution, as I’ve already stated.

        If it doesn’t spit out raw data and instead changes it somehow, it’s a derivative work.

        I can spell out the distinction for you twice more if you still don’t get it.

        • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly! Then you agree that because chatgpt can be coerced into spitting out raw, unmodified data, distributing it is a violation of copyright. Glad we’re on the same page.

          You should look up the term “rhetorical question” by the way.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            So you understand the distinction between distribution and derivative work? Great!