Firefox outperforms Chrome in speed for the first time according to a Speedometer assessment::undefined
There is no way its the first time. Firefox has been faster for years.
In recent years, that was false. Only recently had it surpassed chrome
On low end PCs, Firefox always outspend chrome, at least for me. I remember trying to play happy wheels on my think pad laptop back in the day and I would get low fps on chrome but never on Firefox. That experience is what made me switch to the superior browser.
Oh look, it’s the daily “Firefox outperforms Chrome” post…
EDIT: yesterday’s post: https://lemmy.world/post/1779611
From the same user too… This account just spams articles to this community and never comments. Looks like an old reddit-style karma farmer
It’s literally a bot account.
Pretty sure it’s to feed content into the sub.
It is. It says so on its profile page.
It’s honestly one of the more annoying ones too imo.
It’s an historic day! Also within 24h Google starts floating DRM websites
As someone that recently moved from Chrome to Firefox, I can definitely confirm this.
I did to. Chrome is so bloated.
I love firefox. I love the freedom you have with the browser. I got vertical tabs and a good theme I’m happy.
Switched to Firefox years ago and never looked back.
I’ve loved Chrome (on windows) for many years but at this point when you open task manager it’s practically using up more resources than the operating system. Because it is. It’s essentially like running a second operating system…
Great idea, Google should do that and call it like… Chrome O-- ChromOS, yeah that’s it.
Exactly, should a web browser need to be a complete operating system, or can it just show you the damn internet? Feeling like a cranky old man here
There is this misconception of “using a lot of ram = bad”, but memory is not like cpu or gpu cycles.
Unused memory is wasted memory. Chrome will use available memory to improve responsiveness. Primarily the memory use comes from keeping all open tabs in memory, so they are in the same state as you left them.
When the system runs low on ram, chrome will start discarding old tabs and giving back memory to other processes. Firefox does the same thing.
Also windows task manager is very inconsistent when it comes to memory usage. Right now it’s telling me chromium is using 1.4gb for 47 tabs. And memory usage is a lot more complicated anyway.
Counter-point: Chrome brought multiple computers/laptops to a standstill, but Firefox doesn’t. I used Chrome for years and just put up with it… But the lagging/slowness literally stopped when I switched. So while I’m sure you’re right in theory, something about Google’s implementation sucked on all the computers I used it on…
Hmm…interesting. I didn’t know Chrome was smart enough to use less ram if the system is taxed. Figured it just always used a shit ton…which sucks if you’re editing videos or something and need to open a browser or something.
That’s because it isn’t as smart as it sounds. Like with everything in programming there’s a tradeoff being made. This behavior runs the risk of making the computer unresponsive while the garbage collector and the scheduler run after each other trying to clean house. “Unused memory is wasted memory” is kind of a fallacy. Overextending and requesting the OS for more memory than is available will always hurt performance. Ram operations aren’t free, however much software engineers like to pretend they are. Neither are scheduling tasks. They cost time and responsiveness and can add up fast.
One of the immediate consequences, for example, is that if the users wants to interact with one of the discarded tabs, now the browser has to re-download the page (internet IO is insanely slow compared to disk operations), reload it to memory from disk cache which can also be slow—specially if the disk is busy with other IO—discard other older tabs to make room (compounding the problem), be slapped in the wrist because the OS says “No, you can’t have DaVinci’s RAM!” scramble for some more ram from some other idle task, reestablish the page state which might’ve been lost. Etc. it becomes messy fast, and now the user is frustrated that “I was reading this page a minute ago, why is it taking so long to load again, is my OS frozen? Damn I lost the forms I had partially filled?” So no, ballooning memory until it’s all used up is not inherently always a good strategy. Nevermind that Chrome (and FF as well) have been found to have severe memory leaks that come and go.
More reasons to keep using Firefox just keep on coming up like excellent extensions, in-browser PDF editor, and now more speed. I switched to Firefox 2 years ago with uBO and I don’t think I’d ever switch back to Chrome.
Not surprised. But Google Meet stalls on FF as does Streamyard. Probably a WebRTC bug
Switched to Firefox and Bitwarden due to Lemmy feedback. Haven’t looked back.
Had been using Firefox before I had to move away due to persistent crashing of Firefox and Surfshark VPN extension not working.
I have been using Edge and I will now try using Firefox again.
Do we have these feature (or extensions) I have been using in Edge?
- vertical tab
- tab group
I use tree style tabs and the collapsible hierarchical nature of them act like defacto groups, though there may be another extension specifically for grouping that I’ve not heard of
Wow that’s awesome looking, thx for the link!
these features first appeared in Firefox… I’ve been using tab groups and tree-style tabs(/vertical tabs) for longer than Edge exists.
Extensions or built-in?
I didn’t notice them.
Extensions. Although, tab groups used to be built in.
Thanks.
I am gonna try Tree style tab and Simple Tab Group with its extensions.
Personally, I’m using this implantation. It requires a bit of tweaking, but the end result is great.
Edit: Just noticed there’s a bug with
tabCenterReborn.css. It’s so lengthy now that it should be minified, otherwise Tab Center Reborn won’t save it.
I switched to Firefox from Mozilla Suite and never looked back.
What is the difference?
Mozilla suite was the predecessor, containing a web browser, e-mail client, web page editor, and IRC client. It was discontinued 17 years ago in favor of Firefox and Thunderbird, but continued by the community in the form of SeaMonkey.
Not surprising as Chrome has been getting more bloated all along. Then again, I personally use Vivaldi as Firefox doesn’t have a built-in translator tool.
It’s weird that it’s not built in but there is a Mozilla add-on for it to provide on-device translations https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/firefox-translations/
Built-in local translations are coming soon! Already available in nightly.
It’s good to see this result replicated. The only thing I wish Firefox had natively was tab groups, they’re a really useful feature for various organizing things. Otherwise, they’re clearly one of not the best browser on the market.
Firefox not having tab groups is the only reason I haven’t switched over, once they do that I’ll probably never use a chromium browser again.
I’m pretty sure there is an extension for that.
I’ve tried the extension, it just didn’t compare for me.
Everyone on Lemmy loves Firefox. Meanwhile I haven’t seen anyone talk about how good Arc is (in spite of being another chromium browser)
Who develops the Arc browser? Is it open source?
arc is developed by The Browser Company. its free, but I don’t believe it’s open source. its basically a UI layer on top of chromium so its performance is about what you would get out of Chrome.
If it’s not open source and its tacked on to Chromium which is already bloated, why compare it to Firefox?
Dunno. I wasn’t the OP.
I’m wondering if they’re trustworthy with my data? I use the Brave browser and at least so far they haven’t tried to sell my browsing data. I’ve heard about the selling Brave Search stuff though, so I’m looking for good alternatives.
You use a browser whose business model is based on monitizing user activity tracking… And are happy with the privacy?
The first warning signs where the bottomless marketing budget of Brave after it was brand new. Marketing money that was obviously well worth it since their users do the marketing now. The thing is marketing budgets come from something and for brand new companies that don’t have income streams that something is usually investors who have been sold a value proposition. And that value proposition is most likely you and your data.
Interesting, thank you. Any truly privacy focused browsers you recommend?
Fennec? It’s based off of Firefox.
Thanks, I’ll check it out.
