First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

  • majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nuclear is Non-renewable, but it’s not a Fossil fuel:

    A hydrocarbon-based fuel, such as petroleum, coal, or natural gas, derived from living matter of a previous geologic time.

    • porkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have plenty of nuclear fuel and waste is a drop in an ocean compared to that of fossil fuels.

      • majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. This is why I’m annoyed the UK is dumping its money into oil and coal fuel sources. We need more Nuclear plants and we should have started building these yesterday.

        • Acid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tory government investing in nuclear energy?

          Nah boris and his lot would rather get bungs from the local lads and keep us in the dark ages.

          Labour aren’t exactly gonna do it either with Tory lite candidates atm. We are well and truly proper fucked.

        • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The best time to plant a tree build a nuclear power plant was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

        • porkins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I asked for that. In a manner-of-speaking, if you compared by the football field filled in area with barrels of waste. It would be about one for all the annual nuclear waste where turning the byproduct of combustible fossil fuels into just the vapor and ash equivalent would fill thousands. It arguably wouldn’t win from a toxicity perspective. For all the waste in the ocean from Fukushima, the only outcome were that the marine life seemed to have thrived off the low-level radiation.