• TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But posting a direct reply will give them additional attention, from your own followers and from algorithmic boosting.

    If simply replying to bad actors with facts and demanding decency helped in any way, they wouldn’t have gotten as relevant as they are.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s all good theory or whatever, but you ain’t gonna stop Donald Trump (or DeSantis) from getting boosted to the top. Certainly not when Elon is in charge of Twitter.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course, because these already have a whole established follower base. But it can prevent upcoming reactionary outrage mongers from gaining momentum.

        Keep in mind that I didn’t say to ignore them entirely, I said that replying directly is a bad approach. Because the people who already follow them likely won’t listen to reason, and it might only highlight it to potential targets to be radicalized. But bad rhetoric can be countered and refuted without direct attribution. You could instead reply to a screenshot with the handle cut out or just speak on the topic without bringing up who is stirring shit this time around.