• 0 Posts
  • 141 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m not overly worried about a few random Linux distros that did strange things, nor raspberry pi’s. I mean I don’t know why you’d use 32 bit on an 8gb pi anyways, so it shouldn’t affect anyone unless they did something REALLY strange.

    For the average user, neither of those scenarios mattered, especially back when the problem was at its peak.

    2 years was a long time to wait to use the extra memory that Linux could use out of the box.

    I honestly don’t even remember XP having PAE, but if you NEED the validation, sure, Microsoft EVENTUALLY got it.

    Except that Microsoft removed it in SP2 LOL!

    And all the home use versions of XP still maxed out at 4gb.

    There could see the memory but couldn’t use it, oh I’d forgotten that!

    Wikipedia was a fun read.



  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhy we don't have 128-bit CPUs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Intel PAE if the answer, but it still came with other issues, so 64 was still the better answer.

    Also the entire article comes down to simple math.

    Bits is the number of digits.

    So like a 4 digit number maxes out at 9999 but an 8 digit number maxes out at 99 999 999

    So when you double the number of digits, the max size available is exponential. 10^4 bigger in this case. It just sounds small because you’re showing that the exponent doubles.

    10^4 is WAY smaller than 10^8





  • Right but you’re missing the whole “you can’t separate sexual abuse from the power imbalance”

    It’s like when a female guard has sex with a male inmate.

    I believe that most of the time that happens, the inmate went after the guard. I also believe that if you asked the inmate that they consented to it 100%.

    But because the power dynamic at play is so severe, you just have to hardline it and say that as the CEO it’s illegal for you to dip in the company ink.

    Probably not worth jail time, maybe just lose your job and be forbidden from directorships/ceo for 10 years?













  • You’re over simplifying my statements to try and support what’s going to be a failed investment.

    Crypto allows you to send 10k internationally with zero trust. That’s insanity.

    You can’t give one reasonable use case for it.

    “You might want your salary to be a secret, until you have to report it for taxes.”

    Sooooo, secret from whom? Because your neighbour and the cops can’t see your salary already. The problem doesn’t exist, unless your goal is tax fraud. But you quickly backed out of that argument because you saw the corner you were painting yourself into.

    I totally agree that privacy is, and should remain an inalienable right, and you shouldn’t need a reason for information to be private.

    Money isn’t information in itself. Who you give it to CAN be, but cash still solves that problem, so the problem doesn’t exist…… Until you’re trying to use cash remotely, but there are no reasonable use cases for needing anonymity in international money transfers. In fact there’s a ton of safety in having banks involved. It’s not 100% secure, but nothing ever is. As opposed to throwing your monero into the wind and hoping the other person ships your illicit items.