![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
They are perfectly free to do that. They just have to resubscribe from their new home country at the new rate. Just like with telephone service or cable tv. It’s not like they will get in trouble or would be prevented from moving.
They are perfectly free to do that. They just have to resubscribe from their new home country at the new rate. Just like with telephone service or cable tv. It’s not like they will get in trouble or would be prevented from moving.
Learning German taught me how messed up non-English languages are. Having to memorize if every noun is either male, female, or neuter just so you can use the right form of “the” with it is crazy.
And If they label the pedal “stop” and it doesn’t actually stop the car?
Does Apple have actual instructions and documentation that explains this? I honestly didn’t know, as I’ve never used iMessage.
I look in the mirror when I have a specific mirror in mind when I say it. Otherwise it’s a mirror.
Bring a wet towel inside the car? Are you mad?!
They saved the pretty young white girl, yay!
All true, which is what I meant by “not well” encrypted. It’s technically encrypted, but for all practical purposes it might as well not be.
It IS encrypted. Not well, but it’s encrypted.
Me too! But only the ones on my right foot.
I can snap with my toes the same way people snap their fingers, but only with the right foot for some reason.
Is this an attempt to obscure a real spy balloon? Send over so many trash filled ones that they start ignoring the real deal when it flies overhead?
I consider “context”, even if not added explicitly by the user, to be part of the input.
Not exactly. The answers would be exactly the same given the exact same inputs if they didn’t intentionally and purposefully inject some random jitter into the algorithm each time specifically to avoid getting the same answer each time
I know how you feel I used to love watching all the SpaceX launches, but I just can’t bring myself to care anymore about anything Musk is involved in.
ICQ died the day they were bought by AOL.
It costs something to build and maintain the infrastructure to distribute power. Typically that cost is recovered through payments for the generation of the power, which becomes a problem if generation costs get too low. It suggests that we should probably consider a different model of paying for that infrastructure now that the reality of generation has changed.
You can “explain” it that way as much as you want, that doesn’t make it true.
That’s a completely different kind of AI. This story, and all the discussion up to this point, has been about the LLM based AIs being employed by Google search and ChatGPT.
How is it unfair? Couldn’t any team do the same thing?