![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
A gpg key has to be stored on something, and that can be stolen or lost. (Or degraded over time).
You are essentially pushing for 1 factor authentication. Its a strong factor, but still just 1.
A gpg key has to be stored on something, and that can be stolen or lost. (Or degraded over time).
You are essentially pushing for 1 factor authentication. Its a strong factor, but still just 1.
Within my company there is a mix of Scrum and Kanban, so Agile != Scrum.
I don’t think it makes much sense to say “We are switching from Agile to Kanban”, but “We are switching from Scrum to Kanban” does make sense (at least to me)
Kanban is Agile. They are pushing Impact Engineering.
elon cant run for pres anyway, he wasnt born in the US.
Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.
If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.
If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn’t), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can’t already do.
I’m sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.
That would be actually valuable for consumers and advertisers. Shame its impossible.
Has it worked? Its never led to a repeat purchase for me. :/
So, advertising the things I have already bought? Not sure thats gonna be super successful…
Its likely to be a slow rollout thing. I havent either for what its worth.
I did have a couple of videos fail to play, but they worked on refresh so I assume that was unrelated.
True, if the LLM is training on those legal documents. Less true if its trained on whatever random garbage was scrapped out of reddit.
At least this time the Rep. was actually reviewing the output, so thats responsible at least.
Cyber security companies report on APTs all the time, nothing unusual about that.
What is worrying about Google being involved with this report? They have an internet security division, this is exactly their job?
Weirdly, i dont think that episode freaked me out, but yeah, in hindsight it probably should have.
Not seasame street, but thomas the tank engine. There was an episode where Thomas got covered in tar and feathers (i think? Was a while ago), and that freaked younger me out. Never watched it again.
Not sure I agree with me, but ok :)
Well, yeah, like I said, way to late to change. Programmers are notoriously bad at naming things, but once named, its hard to change.
It might have made the “Which instance do I join?” question a bit more intuitive and self-answerable if it was instead:
Q: Which community do I join? A: Oh, obvious, the one that seems to match my IRL community/values.
(If its not obvious, I am also a programmer, so any opinions on usability and human behaviour are also completely detached from reality 😄)
Its way to late to fix, but instance => community and subreddit => subcommunities would have kept some of the nomenclature similar.
And instances being a community seems to be how beehaw and others want to work anyway.
Luigis Mansion 3 has a pretty overt acknowledgement of the Virtual Boys existance. The entire in game menu is in one.
I vaguely recall reading something about some of their departments were not even using the floppy. Like you had to submit with a floppy, but it was never actually written or read from, and you supplied the documents another way. (I could have entirely made this up, don’t quote me)