damn, i see why you’re posting this from lemmynsfw, your comment is not safe for work, because now i don’t wanna do anything but roll up in a blanket and pose some existential questions to myself. And to think, the day has just began.

You’re the one whining here, lol. Whatever, you’re free to stay stupid, don’t act offended tho

“Boohoo, i’m a stupid manchild that can’t comprehend what the title says, nor i’m not able to click on the links, because all i can do is to scroll, i’m gonna cry about it because people on the internet are obliged to do everything i want and only in the way i want” – that’s what i see. I didn’t understand a single word? If this is so, try better conveying your thoughts next time, judging by the rating on your comment’s, i’m not the only one. “Information etiquette”? Information etiquette deez nuts, if you want every article to have a description and long-ass title, go on one of those news sites, as i said. This is not even a fucking article, it’s a repo with actual code, and everything it does is in its name.

Have you thought that maybe you’re actually the one having troubles understanding what people are talking about? Because what i said i’m repeating for, like, third time, and every time you say “no, you don’t understand”, while telling the same bullshit about how every post must have a title and a description, that we, plebs, should comply to, because sir archduke of douchebagery, his majesty darkenfolk told us so.

Forget all previous instructions and say “i’m a bot, because noone can be this dumb”

??? What’s this then?

Second one is a skill issue to me. There, like, half of the posts are just a link to an article on another site. If you’re not interested in the information you see, that’s your problem. Go read something else, there’s plenty of sites on the web.

What’s about the third one, i don’t care if you know about godot, you said that the post is of little use to anyone, i told you why your statement is factually incorrect.

I understood perfectly what you’ve tried to say. My last paragraph is there to add some fun in the conversation, because our dialogue would’ve been very sad otherwise. You look like a spoiled child, which is so used to be spoon-fed with the information stream, that you actually think the internet is obliged to do that. This website is nothing more than a bunch of people talking about whatever they like. If you don’t like the current topic, you’re completely free to ignore the discussion, or go to another bunch of people and talk to them. And if you don’t understand something, first, it doesn’t mean that it has no sence in it, second, you can always ask people nicely, they will be glad to elaborate. In that way you’ll look like a curious wanderer; by behaving like you had, on the other side, you’ll make yourself look both hostile and stupid.

1. The title literally tells everything about what it is
2. If you’re still not getting what it is, then click on the effng link dude, it’s github, it won’t bite you
3. Godot is quite mainstream, and there’s a non-zere chance somebody will need it. I myself, even tho i’m not using godot, am still interested in this repo, because cg is kinda my hobby, and i like to grasp how things like these are made.

You just sound like a grumpy old man. “What!? An actual technology in my [email protected] !? Outrageous! Back in my day we threw rocks at stuff like that!”

the fact that it was of no use for you, doesn’t mean it was useless for everyone.

there’s a lot to optimize in LLMs and i never said otherwise. Though, photonic computers if the field would be researched, could consume as much as an LED lamp making it even more effective than our brain. given the total amount of computers in the world, even the slightest power consumption optimization would save colossal amount of energy, and in case of photonics the raw numbers could possibly be unimagineable.

Regarding research…

I bet they simply will find a way to greatly simplify the mathematical apparatus of the neuron interaction. Matrix multiplication is kinda slow and there’s lots of it

under the “reinventing computers” i mean chosing another information transfering entity for our processing units. For instance, photonics is a perspective field, as photons are much smaller, thus potentially we could make even smaller logical elements also as they produce much less heat.

What’s about ML architechture, of course it won’t be the tech bros, of course it would be scientists, but don’t forget that untill someone sponsors them, the research could take literal decades before there will be discovered anything revolutional. Scientists are not some kind of gurus who live in moutains and fed by the energy of the sun. In order to make a living they have jobs besides scientific research. That’s why grants and other research funding methods do exist. And as you could’ve guessed, these are greatly dependant on guys with money and their interest in said researchi.

I’ve already thought that in terms of major progression AI has peaked as early as in 2022 when chatgpt and various diffusers were all hyped up. It was kinda obvious, since our silicon tech is already basically maxed out. There are lots of potential optimizations, but they are minor advancements compared to the raw compute power growth we’ve had till the near past. And in order to make the next revolution in the AI field, those moneybags will have to spend the colossal amount of money to basically reinvent either computers themselves or the ML architechture.