I think it’s to clarify that it’s not coming from the judgement of the newspaper. The Nazi himself is calling himself a Nazi. So, there’s no doubt about it.

Yeah, I don’t feel well at all with the idea of letting newborns who may not even started suckling use social media. It’s a bit too soon.

Me.

I say it’s wrong and I’ll try to stop you.

Wouldn’t that generate images of children with small-sized adult bodies?

If it doesn’t know what a child’s body looks like, it can’t just figure it out.

You know Russia could just stop invading Ukraine, right?

It’s an average elephant. Maybe there are elephants heavier than the haul

Seriously I was confused too, I thought that might be his lawyer.

I think Muslims take this more seriously because, as someone who grew up in a region where most people identified Catholic (and most of the rest just had no religion) but didn’t practice much, I wasn’t even aware of that rule.

Yea, really not wanting friends would be unusual but I figure out if that’s what you want, hookups are the only solution. If you have good looks enough and are not socially offputting.

Also, prostitutes. For this, you just need to not be socially offputting, and to have money.

Sorry I’m stuck overanalyzing solutions for a likely troll.

I thought you meant friendship with the sexual partner, not as a skill / attitude with anyone. Nevermind then

What about hookups though? I’d say there isn’t much human connection there, and certainly not friendship.

deleted by creator

It’s more complex than this, but it’s related to climatic change.

First, we’re still in the ice age. We’re just in an interglacial period.

During the glaciation, humans mainly hunted a few big game. It was an inhospitable environment.

When the glaciation ended, the climate became more stable, warmer, more clement. Rivers rised and became calmer, as the sea level rose.

Humans started diversifying and broadening what they ate. They collected much more plants, hunted more animal species, notably small game, fished much more. It was the mesolithic.

In zones that were particularly abundant in resources, probably at the edges of ecozones, it became possible and interesting to settle down somewhat, and defend this territory against outsiders. Owning resources allowed to invest time and labor into making things more productive. Domestication was part of that.

Not all regions are suitable, or have sufficient domesticable species. Some places took much longer than others to really get farming going, and most never did, until domesticates arrived there from somewhere else.

This is a common question in economics.

It’s called technological unemploymemt and it’s a type of structural unemployment.

Economists generally believe that this is temporary. Workers will take new jobs that are now available or learn new skills to do so.

An example is how most of the population were farmers, before the agricultural revolution ans the industrial revolution. Efficiency improvements to agriculture happened, and now there’s like only about 1% of the population in agriculture. Yet, most people are not unemployed.

There was also a time in England when a large part of the population were coal miners. Same story.

Each economic and technological improvement expands the economy, which creates new jobs.

There’s been an argument by some, Ray Kurzweil if I remember correctly, but others as well, that we will eventually reach a point where humans are obsolete. There was a time when we used horses as the main mode of land transportation. Now, this is very marginal, and we use horses for a few other things, but really there’s not that much use for them. Not as much as before. The same might happen to humans. Machines might become better than humans, for everything.

Another problem that might be happening is that the rate of technological change might be too fast for society to adapt, leaving us with an ever larger structural unemployment.

One of the solution that has been suggested is providing a basic income to everyone, so that losing your job isn’t as much of a big problem, and would leave you time to find another job or learn a new skill to do so.

Yes, there have been problems for a long time there, but then Myanmar was apparently on a path to democracy, but then the coup happened, so now there are problems again. It’s the current civil war I’m referring to.

A few years. About 1 more than the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, if I remember correctly

Judging from the screenshots, it seems to be completely non-sexualized. You could hardly get aroused by looking at the woman’s body there.

Depends what.

Customer-facing work: you can stay open longer.

Office work: yeah, since productivity plummets, I don’t think it helps much, if at all.

If you get a new customer, you may get one for several years without adding any new effort.