This is the only path forward.

With respect to 2, it would stop others scrapping the content to train more open models on. This would essentially give Reddit exclusive access to the training data.

Just add 11 to utc.

No harder than having different times in different places.

So it looks like protonmail is actually legit then

Of course poor regulation can be bad, it was a silly question that was loaded. Look at, for example the 2002 tort reforms and the damage that did to public safety.

Imagine how much damage could be done to individual privacy and freedom by an ill informed legislature if they elect to regulate gradient descent.

No, they said bs is published about ai.

I just use and old laptop

If and only if the trained model is accessible without licence.

E.g. I don’t want Amazon rolling out a Ilm for $100 a month based on freely accessible tutorials written by small developers.

But yeah duck copyright

These comments often indicate a lack of understanding about ai.

Ml algorithms have been in use for nearly 50 years. They certainly become much more common since about 2012, particularly with the development of CUDA, It’s not just some new trend or buzz word.

Rather, what we starting to see are the fruits of our labour. There are so many really hard problems that just cannot be solved with deductive reasoning.

The mistral-7b is a good compromise of speed and intelligence. Grab it in a GPTQ 4bit.

If you can find a copy yeah. GNU sed isn’t written for windows but I’m sure you can find another version of sed that targets windows.

Oh no you need a 3060 at least :(

Requires cuda. They’re essentially large mathematical equations that solve the probability of the next word.

The equations are derived by trying different combinations of values until one works well. (This is the learning in machine learning). The trick is changing the numbers in a way that gets better each time (see e.g. gradient descent)

Many are close!

In terms of usability though, they are better.

For example, ask GPT4 for an example of cross site scripting in flask and you’ll have an ethics discussion. Grab an uncensored model off HuggingFace you’re off to the races

sd is written in rust and cross platform https://github.com/chmln/sd

Does awk run on windows?

Translation is very different from generation.

As a matter of fact, even AI generation has different grades of quality.

SEO garbage is certainly not the same as an article with AI generated components and very different from a translated article.

Am I mistaken in believing it is an already a browser option?

Off the top of my head Qutebrowser and Falkon both support not-saving 3rd party cookies.

Oh no, I was just pointing it out for others. I think using the title post is perfectly reasonable.

Thank you for posting, I found it interesting.

It’s worth noting that OP simply used the article title.

The article title is a little biased, individuals must take greater personal responsibility.

users knowingly opted into a feature that had a clear privacy risk.

Strong passwords often aren’t at issue, password re-use is. If un-{salted, hashed} passwords were compromised in a previous breach, then it doesn’t matter how strong those passwords are.

Every user who was compromised:

1. Put their DNA profile online
2. Opted to share their information in some way

A further subset of users failed to use a unique and strong password.

A 2FA token (think Matrix) might have helped here, other than that, individuals need to take a greater responsibility for personal privacy. This isn’t an essential service like water, banking, electricity etc. This is a place to upload your DNA profile…