I feel bad for Suno’s lawyer.

The funny thing is there’s a bunch of Portlands, but it’s always that particular one.

Bikes are a scam perpetuated by big tire. Run at full speed for all of your travel.

Pros:

• Green (non industrial footprint)
• No bike to get stolen
• Harkens back to primitive man chasing gazelles
• Fantastic for heart health
• Just as fast as biking if you run as fast as you bike
• No need for safety equipment (raw)

Cons:

• Others will be intimidated by your presence
• May require barge poll to fend off potential suitors

This model just came out recently. I wouldn’t pass judgement on them for that.

It’s about the context in which you wear it.

That’s the problem. No people ever think they’re the unenlightened ones. Society changes but not always for the better.

The Constitution is a safety rail to protect us from ourselves.

I think this cleared up our disconnect. I chose oblige to indicate that they require others to do something for them to occur. Most often paying taxes, to pay the provider of a service. This typically isn’t a ‘at gunpoint’ interaction. But negative rights will never require another to do something for it to be practiced.

I agree with your highlighting of the philosophy behind them. I was more concerned about a short rememberable way to differentiate the two.

So I chose oblige vs force to make sure it had the connotation of a civil concession.

Right tools for the right jobs. The issues arise when it’s out of place.

You just reminded me fiddleheads deserve a mention.

If people sold bricks only in the Spring they’d be seasonal. Seasonal ≠ in season, or at peak ripeness.

Tldr: Don’t do this unless you have a business that requires a steam account for tax purposes. It doesn’t need to be successful but it does need to be real.

Trusts are probably a better option for this sort of thing than a LLC.

I agree that it’s a negative liberty. It’s just the from/to language can be misconstrued IMO, the not impede/oblige others framing is more clear without additional information. It’s, again IMO, targeting the core of the differential. Asking of others for inaction vs asking for action.

Funding for public defenders. They’re chronicly overworked and understaffed.

I recently found the American Revolution Podcast by Michael Troy which goes intro insane details about the war. 300+ ~25 minute episodes going into detail on every aspect leading up to and during the war, with a dash of dry humor.

That’s probably the more popular way, but I think it’s easier to misinterpret. For example the freedom of speech, one could think of it as the freedom to speak instead of the freedom from undue censorship. But that right is usually considered a negative one.

Tldr it depends.

You might not notice with adrenaline pumping. As for lethality it really depends on where in your stomach you get hit and the care you get afterwards. In terms of the fight if it’s just your stomach area getting hit nothing shy of a spinal hit would instantly stop you. If they hit an artery you’ve got minutes. If they puncture your intestines and you can’t get care days, before infection catches up to you.

For the actual conflict the only things that will instantly stop are central nervous system hits (brain/spine). Heart and lungs are the next worst, but wouldn’t stop you from claiming a pyrrhic victory. Major arteries are the next big thing to worry about.

The worst part about getting hit in a non vital part of the chest wouldn’t be the force of the blow but the slow agonizing battle with infection that is not unlikely to follow. But absolutely livable and not nearly as bad with modern medical care.

In practical (non legal) terms possibly if it was an actual private party and not a licensed dealer.

Alien is definitely a unique way of putting it. I guess it makes sense in that they are “alien to the nation”. But If I were to ever be forced to move to a different country I’d probably go by ex-pat.

Although I’d say we have more of a culture (increasingly so) of acknowledging immigrants as Americans first. Probably due to the whole melting pot thing. My view of it is anyone who immigrate to the US is an American. But if I moved to another country, like Japan, I don’t think they’d consider me Japanese.

Also that reminds me alien ≠ immigrant. Aliens would be people in the country either temporarily or illegally. Someone who got a green card by marrying an American wouldn’t be an alien for example. If you do the whole immigration thing you’re just an American not an alien.

Just look up Trump-isms. Just like Bush-isms or Biden-isms.

Tldr it depends. Slightly longer generally no, but there’s an exception for hunters.

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-aliens-legally-united-states-purchase-firearms#:~:text=An alien legally in the U.S. is not,possession of a valid hunting license or permit.

The author is wrong on that point.

Per the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives:

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/must-licensees-conduct-nics-background-check-sale-firearms-nonlicensees-gun-shows#:~:text=Must licensees conduct a NICS background check for,sale were taking place at the licensed premises.