What do you ask ChatGPT? I rarely get a correct answer really, it’s all made-up bullshit usually.

Also a lot of infrastructure in Africa is being funded in China, their position there is only going to grow stronger.

They are not. Currently Russian and Belarusian athlete are invited as Individual Neutral Athletes because of the Ukrainian war.

The Dutch wikipedia explains that according to research, 25% to 50% acts because of a sexual preference for minors.

The others only act because they see an easy opportunity to have sex, or worse, want to exploit them.

I guess that’s what he bases his statement on?

Just a bunch of downplaying stuff with definitions and nonsense talk in my opinion.

You didn’t even answer your own question, which also isn’t what OP asked or meant.

No idea how you’re being useful there.

I recommend reading the question. It specifically says “fast food chain”.

The more I hear about Monero, the bigger of a scam it seems

It’s not about the absorption. They get soggy/slimy if you don’t immediately cook them

Not true. Some countries allow it on a national level, but many do not. I believe The Netherlands allows it, but only at lower competition levels.

I think FIFA forbids it entirely, but I’m not entirely sure.

If I copy McDonald’s site one by one for my own restaurant and just change the name, you can expect to be sued.

And yet, their site is available publicly?

I still don’t see how that makes Firefox difficult.

The transition might be difficult, but I rarely see casual people use the options you describe.

It’s as easy as opening the shortcut and start browsing, I see no difference with Chrome there

Why would Firefox be difficult to use?

I just don’t get how someone convicted for ELECTION FRAUD can still be a presidential candidate

Pretty much everyone here agrees that it’s a shitty concept. Doesn’t solve anything and it’s a privacy nightmare.

No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.

Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.

Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don’t have enough info (or for images).

It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.

All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.

Kagi is great, but I just can’t miss $5 a month for it.

I’m using Qwant now and it’s pretty good.

Wild strawberries are amazing. Sad they’re so hard to get a substantial amount of.

Not videogames, but the idea that a car should also be a video game console sounds very childish.