

Do you remember anything about what their opinion was? It might help to narrow it down.
they/them
Do you remember anything about what their opinion was? It might help to narrow it down.
Only a stupid cybercriminal would use Windows
It’s like, the subjective qualia of experience, what we call consciousness, there’s no way to prove anyone else has it, or that they have it the same way you do. That they claim to have it doesn’t mean they actually have an internal experience. Consciousness is one of the biggest mysteries of humanity
There are multiple simulation hypotheses, both are possible, as are others.
I prefer to think we’re simply the hallucinations of a possible brain, with no way to distinguish every possible brain that could exist from ‘real’ brains that exist in reality.
Like ‘You can’t eat your cake and have it, too’ became a less sensible version.
Signal? Telegram?
Just the current weather live wallpaper
No, only rich men have. That doesn’t mean others can’t, but it would be unprecedented.
I suppose it’s a matter of how you go about it. You can not tolerate someone who is intolerant of a specific group of people by either offering understanding and support, explaining how hard it is to change your beliefs and that you’ll help them to be a better person, or you can punch them.
The first option is harder, and feels less satisfying - especially if they’ve hurt people you care about - but it is the solution that has the potential to turn intolerance into tolerance, rather than just making them firmer in their beliefs and hate you more.
Also, tolerance is not inherently good and intolerance is not inherently bad. For example, I am intolerant of people keeping slaves - and you would have to twist the meaning of intolerance to make owning a slave intolerant, rather than just bad - and I don’t think that is a bad thing to be intolerant of.
Food (or a way of getting it), same for water and medicine. Some form of shelter is good, but not the utmost priority, and a simply tree or something to sleep under can be good enough. I wouldn’t immediately go for guns, as there are usually nonviolent solutions to conflict and bringing in a gun only raises the stakes and makes it more likely for people to get hurt.
The knowledge you know in you mind has the potential to be just as valuable, if not more so, as physical items you have. Knowledge on how to catch food, and build shelter, can be more useful that simply owning some cans and a basement.
It’s ‘fem’ in Swedish too, guessing it’s something similar in Norwegian? In Hebrew the first is 5 too (Chamesh/חמש), so that’s an interesting pattern
You can run whatever character you like on your local machine with no oversight!
Age of consent in many countries, including the UK is (rightly) 16
18 people agree with you
That’s a great saying, gonna save that!
For ‘get me movies for free’, I point them to https://fmhy.net/
Assuming I appear naked in a field in England in 1375, I would first try to, in no particular order (at first, then a particular order)
This is all if I have any measure of success at the first things and don’t die or kill myself
Scientifically speaking, there is no absolute reference frame. So you can be wherever you like depending on what reference you choose.
“Did Jet just die?”
“You know, it was really unclear”