This corporate cycle isn’t likely to change anytime soon right?

Top tier corps, boards, Cs, ultimately care about share price and growth right?

Isn’t it tied to their pay incentives? To keep their contracts and incentives, they have to grow or reduce costs.

They make bad choices or bets among the way, no problem, just reduce costs and still meet the metrics. Only people who pay seem to be the workforce, right?

Or am I oversimplifying?

I think that’s synonymous with “all hail the shareholder”

What makes you believe one side’s propaganda over another? Both entities have incentive to illicit sympathy?

Removed by mod

I can’t imagine the pain and bottomless hatred I’d have if my son was killed in a war, but the name thing keeps me from wanting him to travel anywhere that might be a war zone.

Well, anymore than random places in the US already is…

Generically, sure. Seems like some highly complex social issues, religion, and hate might have complicated things…

OPM was hacked a while ago all us gov with clearance taken

Chinese hacked Google and Microsoft to help them with zero day development, since Chinese have the source code now

Chinese hacked Microsoft and got us gov office 365 emails

Russia and China hack everything and everyone to steal intellectual property.

Russia has conducted cyber attacks against the places they invade.

If you Google cyber attacks, you’ll get endless results

https://darknetdiaries.com/

This is a podcast that will cover some of the biggest ones.

If you don’t want to listen to a dork podcast since they can be long, short version is: https://cisoseries.com/category/podcast/cyber-security-headlines/

I’m pretty sure ww3 was already started by stuxnet. Have you not seen the news lately regarding cyber crime/espionage/attacks?

Hey, the navy needs to keep their button pushing skills sharp /s

Lol🤔

You think she was also a stripper?

Just a quick warning: life gets a lot more complex when you look at things holistically instead of tiny headline slices.

If you challenge us to put things into more context, you’re going to hurt our brains…

/s

I agree with your thoughts, that would be nice.

Each server has its own terms. They ban as they see fit.

Yes, if a server allows crap, other servers defed.

Users should find a server whose owner aligns with their values closest.

Also, you can block users, channels, whole servers, bots.

The analogy of the fire department was a good one. Also a very good point about door locks.

I have similar thoughts about the electronic security alarm in my house when I hear the rare security vendor employee insider threat that broke into someone’s house by turning off the alarm. I still have one though. Like you said, I just chose to mostly trust them based on the hope they’ll internally police themselves out of their self interests to keep a good reputation and make money.

I do wish legislation could force vendors to be very transparent with their privileged access instead of the consumer or user just assuming it. Like a surgeon generals warning, “we made this, so we can unlock it. We are also forced by law to tell you when we’ve done it”. This of course is unrealistic from a national security or investigation standpoint.

Also good points about trust. We have to trust an enormous amount of institutions like banks, public service agencies, etc. Americans are having trust issues with law enforcement as a result of too many issues or abuse.

I wonder how many people care more about the secrets in their phone than their bank account?

I also don’t live in a country where I can reasonably expect the government to spy on me and take my freedom just for criticism, so I guess the stakes aren’t as high. The airdrop cracking in China comes to mind. Plenty of countries are being accused of using spyware against journalists and opponents.

Ha, yeah I wish a more concrete link could be made between the stance society has taken with smoking and apply it to visual/auditory pollution.

People are allowed to smoke as long as it’s not being forced upon other people (based on they both have equal rights). What about a right not to be bombarded with garbage every minute while you’re in public? I can’t see this going my way…

I setup our transparent proxy so we can do interception and IPS. I’m interested/concerned about the ability to use an intermediate ca cert downstream inline somewhere (like a teoco) and if regular consumer desktops would alert on that since their browser would trust the root. We GPO place our intermediate cert in the Windows trusted intermediates. I can’t remember if browsing breaks without doing that.

Not really a concern if there’s other certs/TLS required.in addition to the QWACs cert thought.

I got the impression the easier threat/worry was compromise of a nation CA and issuing illicit duplicate site certs, to then spoof a bank site. Still requires traffic redirection with DNS or routing though I think.

Another thought I had was regarding interception. Anyone with access to root cert can decrypt the data. My understanding was that these certs were supposed to be counter signing right?

Otherwise, wouldnt any government implementing this just be conducting zero effort surveillance?

Did you Google this, or is this your profession?