Paradox Deputy CEO Mattias Lilja is announcing this just like he was the one to announce the changes to Cities Skylines 2 development.
Apparently he was made Deputy CEO only this year, but has been with Paradox for years. I really wonder: does he get picked to announce these things because no one else wants to take responsibility? Or is he the one stepping in where the rest of the management have let things run out of control?
Sure. Like @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] … and there definitely are more people that I see regularly and simply cant think of their names right now
My bad. Doesnt change what I mean though: the AI should not say “it’s also great to put glue on the pizza” - it should either not reference that at all or say “fucksmith on reddit recommends glue on pizza”.
The main field where they are already actively in professuonal use are rough drafts in creative fields: quickly generate possible outlines for a text, a speech, an art piece. Visualize where something could be going, in order to decide which direction to pick.
Also, models that work differently from the GPTs are already in use in science, scanning through huge amounts of texts in archives to help analyzing or search for something in particular. Help find patterns in things for studies. Etc.
The “personal assistant AI” thing obviously isnt quite working yet. I think it will take some time and models with a different technological structure (not GPT) to achieve progress in that regard.
IMO these issues are mainly with the interface / how the AI summaries are presented.
The issue with incorrect answers like the glue on pizza one isnt “hallucination”. The LLM is pulling that info from an existing webpage (The Onion). The thing they need to change is how that info is portrayed. Not “one tip is to use glue”, but rather “the satirical site the Onion says to use glue”.
Hallucination should be combatted by the fact that the AI cant show a proper source for facts it made up itself.
Do you actually understand what you are posting yourself? Qatar funded Hamas under an agreement with Bibi which enabled Bibis strategy and Qatars own political goals. Did Israel fund Hamas in those years? No. Did Israel actively guarantee that Qatar funds Hamas? Yes.
Ah yes, the Hamas Leadership wellknown for not committing war crimes
I think it used to allow all kinds of erotic content and fetish stuff, just not outright porn.
Because for one, it means the Guardian actually spoke to multiple people and didnt just hear something via three other people. And it means those people are actually willing to have their names and faces known publically. Making false allegations under your real name would be quite stupid.
Hm, his statement in response to the Guardian is very unusual for someone accused of sexual misconduct. Either he feels very safe that he can hide this, or he really didnt do it and somehow is the target of a campaign.
Edit: The Guardian article literally has names and photos of the women who accuse him. That’s enough to convince me that they indeed were violated by him.
Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet claims that he destroyed the camera.
who would represent Palestine?
The PLO, just as they are right now and have been for 30 years. Not Hamas.
Crazy how Venezuela is only an ice field today, used to be quite a big country…
/s
They are well-known as al-Ḥūṯiyyūn, but you’re right, I should call them Ansar Allah.
“Yemeni people” probably means Houthi-aligned people, I guess?
If it was teenagers, this would be what I’d expect. That would at least be an explanation (a shitty one, but teenagers have stupid brains).
Far more likely in this case that those men did it simply out of spite.
Grade A geopolitical analysis lol
What is more likely?
UK, France and Jordan want to protect Israel (who has the most capable air defense systems in the region)
UK, France and Jordan hate Iran and want to counter an Iranian military operation that could destabilize the region further; and also gain momentum for pressuring Israel for concessions
Exactly. The UK trapped Assange for years inside that embassy but they didnt dare to actually raid it. That’s a step way way too far.
They are known for making a browser that constantly puts them into a financial deficit. Mozilla is still looking for a way to pay their bills in the long run.