Why have an international incident when you can just persecute your own arabs instead?

Itsthesamepicture.jpg

Oh, nice. I can’t see that in the Boost app, but is plain to see on a web link. Thanks!

It would be interesting to know more detail on the attacks. I’ve seen other sources talking about groups of Haifa fans collecting to chant about killing arabs, pulling down locals’ Palestine flags and a video of them physically assaulting an Arab man outside Central Station.

Which rule did that break?

By “Civil War” I think you meant to say “Russian Occupation of Crimea”

Removed by mod

My point was that denazification was not the reason. So you agree with my only point and then extrapolated a bunch if other stuff.

Aha, but Azov is very powerful neo-nazi movement. They and their allies may hold no political seats, but the only way to be sure is full-scale invasion special military operation. Will only be few days weeks months years

I agree it was the Democrats and the Democrats alone that are responsible for the next 4 years.

Now come take a look at this bridge, I need to shift it quickly so I’ll let you have a bargain price.

Ahh America. Land of the free, home of the Union busting corporations literally making robot scabs

I imagine they mean like Ottoman coffeehouse rather than Starbucks, but still true about the lack of whiteboards

Never thought he would refer to himself as the wedge, but it’s an image of a three-way I never wanted in my mind

MediaBiasFactChecker bot knew all along

Sorry, next time I will look at all Ukrainian soldier social media accounts and then look up who Stepan Bandera is and worship him and I’m sure that will provide more context to the article you posted

You seem to be completely ignoring my analysis of the content and the source and the MPs background which I posted above. It seems like I’ve thought about it more than you.

That would be the “Source of the source”

Thanks for the additional context.

The additional context: “yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn’t enough. You need to investigate more but I won’t provide any links or other sources.”

TIL its tOtALlY rANdOm to read the “About Us” page of a website that people are discussing the origin of.

Do you realise I’m a different person to the other poster? You told them to read the website and you are telling me not to read the website.

I already clicked through to the source, an RT article, which is clearly labelled as posted by the Russian part of BRICS.

I also looked up the MP, who was expelled from her liberal party for corrupt activities and now represents the party of an oligarch which has less than 1% of the national vote share.

So yes in conclusion, it is Russian propaganda. Who knows if the 100,000 figure is true, she is the only source, but without context it doesn’t really mean anything anyway.

Was I supposed to read all that or not?