![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
Source: Communist Party of India
lol
KulliRaivo
Source: Communist Party of India
lol
How is that a good example of insecurity of any kind?
I didn’t imply you wanted it
Wasn’t ancient Olympics a supershow of their time?
Well it’s not employees want the corporations to have unionized, but they just have less power to do anything about it
It’s just as stupid as you fear. Music stops when you close your screen.
Great music player, Google.
You see the Avengers are super big into eugenics. It’s in the subtext mate
It might not be the best move to hype and sell it to such degree that seven years of development time is not enough. Got too ambitious I guess.
It’s basically a meme at this point to link to this, but Crowbcat got you covered
Lot of missing features and loads of bugs. It just wasn’t what they hyped it up to be
The bands you loved at 15-17 are probably the bands that you’ll love forever.
Thank god that wasn’t the case. Listened to some awful shit as a kid
I’m more puzzled about Sudan. What are these maps about, what’s “New Middle East”? I looked up articles about the speech but they don’t really clarify the deal about Sudan
I just meant that that’s often morality based, as in general public holds companies to some moral standard. Often it’s a fairly low standard though, as you’ve pointed out.
If I buy a map I don’t just drive down the road not looking out the window.
Well duh
Yes it very literally is.
I just told you how you misunderstood what I expected and you still insist on understanding me. That’s funny.
Google is providing guidance, sure, but the driver, by virtue of being present, having eyes and a brain, and controlling the fucking vehicle is the one responsible for where the vehicle goes.
There’s not just one person responsible for this. Driver, municipality, Google are all responsible in different amounts.
Google’s guidance is nothing more than them saying, “Based on our data, this is the route we think you should take.”
Yeah and they’re responsible for giving bad guidance, same as the municipality is responsible for not closing down the route and the driver for mistakes they made.
That you think Google shoulders blame in this is actually kind of a sad commentary on how some of society views personal responsibility.
You completely misunderstood me. I take part of the responsibility (lol) for it.
“It’s not criminal so they didn’t have any part or responsibility” is something I don’t understand. Of course the routing was part of the reason this happened. Municipality’s/landowner’s part is how they hadn’t closed to road, put up signage etc. Google’s part is the bad routing. Driver’s part is well, the ultimately the driving. Thinking the routing had no part in the death just doesn’t make sense to me.
how does it make any difference how long the bridge has been out for
Ample time and opportunity to fix it, even being told about the issue. Of course the time makes a difference, if the bridge had collapsed 15 minutes prior then it would be less bad on Google’s side for not having made the change.
Google aren’t actually responsible for updating a section of their map, Yes it would be great if they would do it, but they’re not actually legally required to do it.
Of course there’s responsibility for the bad routing, even if they’re not legally required to update the map/routing. I doubt the case against Google goes anywhere but to me it seems obvious they share a part of the responsibility for their routing.
They obviously have responsibility for their part… 🤦♂️
You are moving the bar
You previously replied to me asking if they have no part and said “that is the only logical conclusion”… If you didn’t get what I meant you should’ve probably mentioned this moving the bar then and not after you gave a silly answer to the question. Better look if nothing else.
That’s not the best way to sell it, me thinks lol