![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
And that assumes no second hand
And that assumes no second hand
Exactly.
Having known multiple trans people and heard them talk about the arguments for and against early disclosure: Fear.
They may not be public about their status, and fear exposure to family or coworkers seeing their public profile.
They may fear harassment from transphobes. This could range from DM accusations of pedophilia to religious screeds to doxxing to death threats.
They may be trying to avoid “chasers.” There are some people for whom a trans body (particularly a transfem body) is a fetish, who don’t actually care about the person inside. Plenty of transpeople don’t appreciate that kind of attention.
Fear of rejection. They may believe that nobody will respond if they’re open about not being cis.
Also two less fear-related (and less common) possibilities:
Ideology. To some people, specifying “transman” or “transwoman” reinforces a social distinction they find invalidating or don’t accept. How many profiles have you seen that specify themselves as “cisman” or “ciswoman”? For these people, it’s a way of rejecting cisgender normativity.
Maybe they just aren’t ready to talk about their genitals yet, or have their first conversation be about their surgical plans or history. Not only can get really repetitive having that be the first conversation with every single match, it means they don’t get any of the information they’re looking for about a potential partner until much later in the process and have to invest a lot of their own time up front. Just like you want the salient information you care about early on, so do they.
Sweat. When it’s hot and humid in particular, a little bit of lift prevents uncomfortable sweat buildup where the scrotum meets the legs.
But she has no way to know that, and a lifetime of evidence to suggest that your attitude isn’t the universal male perspective. Since she doesn’t know you personally, the risk outweighs whatever benefit she gets from the high five.
Absolutely. My partner and I have traded those roles more than once.
It’s called Survivor’s Guilt. It may not be rational, but emotions often aren’t. And yes, they’re likely to wind up with it for both surviving the October 7th raid AND for the deaths in the raid that freed them. Along with all sorts of other trauma related mental health issues.
My apologies - I should have caught that. Fixed.
deleted by creator
And not subject to compliance based retention standards
IWW is a different kind of union. You’re thinking of trade unionism. IWW is more syndicalist, and typically is focused on building community to empower its members and other workers rather than negotiating directly with bosses. Where trade unions silo workers into separate unions based on the type of work, the IWW sees that as a way of fragmenting workers’ power and making it easier for the bosses to play one group of workers against another - the IWW is built on a “One Big Union” idea that organizes ALL workers that are not part of the manager and boss classes.
That can look a lot of ways, like encouraging bottom-up direct action over top-down calls for strike organization. Or the “Wobbly Shop” model, where workers elect their own managers. The IWW has been known to assist with people forming worker-owned cooperatives, and does prison inmate organizing through IWOC (its “Incarcerated Worker’s Organizing Committee”).
The last time it went to the Supreme Court, they couldn’t make up their minds. The current court would probably support it.
Since Wikipedia tracks edits, it wasn’t actually “taken down”, it’s still there if you dig through the edit history. I dug it up:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regulate_(song)&oldid=585931532
Probably because of this. The commenter overstated the situation, but there are valid and serious criticisms to be made.
Can’t help noticing that you make no mention of providing similar defensive capabilities to Palestine. Kind of undercuts your argument.