![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
We might need a Ghandi with nukes…
We might need a Ghandi with nukes…
*Skjold (which means “shield”)
I’ll take your word for it, but no arcade racing game will ever be as fun as the old Burnout games (mainly 3 and Revenge). Certainly not 100% hits though…
I became a parent because I worked in the school system and taught kids without good families. I used to stay after school just to give these kids a positive influence before they get sent back to their shitty home.
Don’t take this as criticism, just trying to understand: What’s the logic here? As a teacher without kids (for now), I feel like I’d have more to give to help my pupils if I don’t have kids of my own.
There’s plenty of master baiters on the internet.
Sorry, I’m just curious, is 2046 in reference to something or just random?
You’re thinking of walls.
It doesn’t track when the argument is that they should be rehabilitated rather than just locked away.
“Nothing was done to rehabilitate them, so rehabilitation doesn’t work.”
There’s literally no logic here…
deleted by creator
you’d have thought they want long-term gains.
They do. They just also want short-term and medium-term gains.
They’ll probably cost around the same amount in dollars by then.
I mean, the theoretically best system is a benevolent and wise dictator.
Same. Tried several others before Boost came out, and nothing felt right.
Fair, but my point is that it illustrates how much stock one should put in single studies.
Okay, but if anyone forms full beliefs from single studies, they’ve grossly misunderstood the details of how science works.
To be fair, there’s plenty of scientific studies with results that are hard to reproduce.
Watch It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia S01E06