There was an actual example where a journalistic article about afghanistan accidentally leaked names of some sources and people who helped westerners in afghanistan, which did actually endanger those people’s lives.

The thing is sometimed articles must be removed from IA (copyright (I disagree with that one) or when information is leaked that could threaten lives), with a blockchain this would be impossible

Good summary. Basically microsoft and nvidia are the ones selling shovels in this gold rush. (Especially the greens)

I came from windows to fedora kde, no regrets so far!! Though for gaming maybe nobara is better as it comes with some stuff preinstalled/configured for gaming. I haven’t really gamed on my laptop yet.

Hey if israel retaliates after it would mean israel attacked a NATO country

Well it says his name and the fact that he is head of the labour party in the text below aswell so…

The current prime minister of the UK and the head of the labour party.

Don’t worry if you’re a tory though, keir starmer has your back!

its the classic tale of not getting arrested for the crime but for hampering in the investigation of that crime lol

I passed it first try as a zoomer

I guess Antstream is kind of such a library? (Just answering the question in the headline. I haven’t read the article.)

If the US wants control over china’s chip fabs they should keep it the way it is right now. ASML already does not sell its latest machines to china because of US orders. If china will not be able to maintain the last-gen ASML models anymore, then they will definitely put even more money into researching their own. And when they have their own machines then the US doesn’t have any control anymore.

Depends on the platform. I’m on iOS, where I really like Ice Cubes I’ve heard megalodon is good on android.

Open-source software (OSS) is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. from Wikipedia

The same article also talks about the difference between open source and source available:

Although the OSI definition of “open-source software” is widely accepted, a small number of people and organizations use the term to refer to software where the source is available for viewing, but which may not legally be modified or redistributed. Such software is more often referred to as source-available, or as shared source, a term coined by Microsoft in 2001

Open source has always meant under a free license. Being able to fork and publish your own versions is integral to the open source philosophy.