That will keep children out for about 12 seconds.
That will keep children out for about 12 seconds.
But yes, if porn is the only use case then this method is self incriminating.
That is precisely the problem. It will mostly or only be used for porn.
Could’ve fooled me. I was under the impression we were sending weapons and trainers to one of our allies who are fighting them. Sounds like an enemy to me.
Before Internet video porn, kids were finding their dads’ Playboys and VHS tapes.
And before that, people living in cabins or caves had sex in full view of their children because there was nowhere else to do it.
Children seeing adults bang is not even remotely new, and nothing overly bad ever came of it. The only reason anyone is concerned with this is because their screwed-up religion taught them to be afraid of sex, and that is not an adequate justification for compromising innocent adults’ privacy.
some conservatives are going to have things blocked that aren’t porn and are helpful to some kid’s sexual education because they’re regressive.
That sounds like the real motivation for this nonsense: not to protect kids from harm, but to protect their parents from the responsibility of properly educating them.
You severely underestimate kids’ technical know-how. If it can be broken, they will break it.
That would require you to disclose proof of your real-life identity to some dubious company for the purpose of unlocking porn. Definitely not privacy-preserving.
Good. China has enough slaves. It doesn’t need more.
That’s not how you spell “imprison the C-suite of”. Last time I read the Constitution, giving aid and comfort to America’s enemies was treason.
The ones that haven’t suddenly decided that Russia is our best friend all of a sudden for some reason that I still can’t figure out.
The reason is money. Either they got paid by Putin or they’ve been brainwashed by someone who got paid by Putin.
Dis gon b gud.
This group has been demanding the censorship of porn, consequences be damned, for decades now. They have failed thus far, and the sky has not fallen as a result, so it’s pretty clear that it’s safe for society and the courts to continue to dismiss their irrational hysteria.
Such an on-device feature would either be trivial to break (if it’s an ordinary API) or be impossible to implement in an open-source browser and OS (if it’s some locked-down DRM-like thing), and the latter is not privacy-preserving because proprietary software tends to be spyware.
If these moralizers would just shut up, go away, and stop trying to ruin the Internet, that’d be great.
Windows is malware.
“I like trains.” —some kid, moments earlier
Apple and Microsoft support aren’t exactly awesome, either, unless you’re a big business with deep pockets. At least with Linux, the system is open, so if there is a way to solve my problem, someone has almost certainly found it already and added it to Arch Wiki or Stack Overflow or something.
Dear Russian warmongers,
You’re welcome. Happy to help.
Love and warheads,
An American citizen.
Feature, not bug.
You all do realize that deep fakes are a thing, right? Video footage isn’t proof of anything.
To be replaced by Nazis. A sad and embarrassing choice by the people of Finland.