czech

Found Elon’s number one fan. Thanks for a good laugh.

Quoted for posterity:

Stop believing what you read without real world experience. Seriously, you’re what’s wrong with social media. You’re so gullible you believe everything you read.

Is FSD perfect or even good yet? No. But I promise you it’s better than any other option out there. I’ve personally used ford, Volvo ridden in waymo and own FSD. It’s not close.

Don’t pretend to know what Teslas mission is. Because you obviously don’t.

Your comments are so laughably ignorant it’s hard to even understand what your point it other than hatred for Musk.

Looks like cameras were introduced in 2021. When was my incident?

That’s the first time you mentioned a camera; there is no “again”.

But what does that change if its still being advertised as self-driving?

People are idiots. They rationalize the safety features e.g. " oh, its not yet approved by regulators so they must use the driver-cam but Musk has said its self-driving so its okay".

Remember that the idea is to DEVELOP self driving software so that the roads can be SAFER (not 100% safe but safer) from idiot humans.

Umm what? The idea is to turn a profit for shareholders. Musk is not Tony Stark. In fact Tesla is now behind other self-driving platforms because Musk does not prioritize safety.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-demanded-cameras-over-radar-in-self-driving-cars-nytimes-2021-12

My uber was a Tesla once. The guy was convinced he could text and drive just fine on the highway. Looked at me like I was a total Karen. The average person is an idiot. Thats the crux of the issue.

Yet so many Tesla owners still think its self-driving. Maybe because that’s how its been marketed for years.

https://files.catbox.moe/vcwliq.png

Do you get it, now?

x.com pointed to paypal back in 2000… Elon may have been that edgelord the entire time!

https://web.archive.org/web/20001018224042/http://x.com/

Until yesterday the page just had an ‘x’ on it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230723092138/http://x.com/

Its only easy to call out anti-protesters if you’re well organized. When police attack peaceful protesters and launch tear gas into peaceful crowds, to force dispersion, people panic and act unpredictably.

Yes but how do you know if the people causing property damage are protesters or anti protestors?That was the crux of my last comment. Nobody likes when protesters are violent so showing up to a protest and starting violence is an easy way to shut it down.

Those are two separate issues. I use a private instance so all my communities only show two subscribers even though I can see all of the posts and comments.

This is what’s happening here.

We saw evidence during the BLM protests that violence was being started by police by both beating on peaceful protesters and using agent-provocateurs. The most famous example was the hooded man wearing police issued boots, who wasnt participating in the protest, knocking out the windows of a Target.

My point is that if violence and property destruction discredit a protest for you then the police have already won. They can turn any protest into violence and destruction if not by outright attacking peaceful protests, then by using an agent-provocateur.