![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
That article says that the US claims the peir area was not used as a landing zone.
That article says that the US claims the peir area was not used as a landing zone.
Keeping the waterfall active would be conservation. I’m sure there would be an ecosystem around it.
It was on NPR’s Up First today, and I’d read it elsewhere too.
Did they try Stack overflow?
Don’t get me started on windows 9
I don’t really get all the windows 11 hate. I have had 0 problems with it
The number one thing that gets in my way of refactoring to function is figuring out what to name the functions takes too long.
Well, they did fuck around and find out. Now they are facing an existential threat of their own and suddenly reasonable?
Gonna assume controlled burns in difficult terrain.
Really I think it’s kind of the opposite. There are plenty of jobs awaiting higher skilled labor. Just as Excel didn’t hurt accounting, it gave many people who weren’t trained I’m accounting to take on more tasks than they would have.
I’ve heard it as “No one is losing their job to AI, but they will lose their jobs to someone who is using AI.”
My guess,
First you must recognize that your title already contains implicit bias, as Israel’s position is that it is a war against Hamas, while others would prefer to frame it as a war against Palestine. Both are true in a sense, but the choice of which is used is a bias. There is no “unbiased” source for these things, just multiple perspectives and agendas.
Trash in/trash out. Small communities of experts can create quality content, but after becoming relevant enough astroturfing begins.
I feel the ambiguity leans towards being misunderstood, so I think it best to clarify.