This is about nukes. Reading comprehension not your thing?

Removed by mod

Who is they? All I hear is someone.

You mean Afghanistan 2.0?

Omg this can’t be any more unrelated. Hyperbole much?

Arms makers claim their weapons might actually be used for killing people. What a surprise.

It’s all on the executives right? All responsibility lays with them. The workers just do their job. If the product fails, it’s the executives responsibility.

In another post you also say that executive pay is too high.

I’m tired of these super generalized polarizing comments. “These bad guys up there” and all of that. Just stop that bs, there is no Karma here.

You have experience in that?

But we’re not in china. If they want to sell here, they have to adher to OUR regulations. I don’t understand why you’re referring to China’s regulations all the time. They are irrelevant.

Besides, I can think of countless Tesla incidents just our of my head where teslas started burning or teslas were driving into random white trucks with Autopilot for no apparent reason.

Source?

It doesn’t recognize the sponsor sections. The community does that. I don’t believe there is any tool right now that can automatically detect the sponsor sections.

The people that hate YT ads hate Google already anyways.

It’s hard to run AI on phones and low-end hardware though. It’s not that easy.

people can get the privacy benefits of going through those proxies.

Exactly. This is why it will still be a threat to data hungry Google.

1. They don’t care because you aren’t watching ads anyways.
2. Where are you going to watch videos now?

The point is that they can use that data for further training. They want to build a monopoly like Google is for search.

Yes.

I’m hearing this everywhere but honestly I have no idea what that actually means. I’m from Europe.

That’s what I mean.

Sometimes people say somewhat radical things that aren’t meant to be toxic but come off as toxic. If we could just replace all of that biased political hate in the discussions with curiosity for the other’s opinion, then the internet would be such a great place.

The community will naturally form spaces that are open to discussion.

I wouldn’t tolerate someone who walked into my house and started arguing with me.

These two things are inherently contrary.

The way Lemmy is built, with treads and text based, it should be a forum where people discuss different topics. The problem is, it’s not. Everyone just wants to circle-jerk but says they are open for discussion. But they are not. People go the way of least resistance and nobody wants to truely argue.

This is the way it is right now and I don’t see how it will change in the future unless people start accepting some level of toxicity and get out of their comforty zone.

That is my opinion at least. I’m glad I’m not banned for this yet. And I’m glad that people respond and upvote and downvote. I actually enjoy getting the downvotes too because it means people read it and reflect on it. This is the way it should be. Talk, be heard, vote, respond, accept.