Yep, that’s basically my job 😂
Yep, that’s basically my job 😂
If we started putting server-class chips on board next to the current ECU, would “the cloud” start to mean “someone else’s car”? 🤔
Reasonable prices, too. With that clientele, you can’t just charge an arm and a leg.
Software engineer, aka glorified code-monkey. Ook!
You might say that my job fits under the umbrella of IT, but no, it’s totally a different thing! ;)
I used to bike to work occasionally. It was maybe a 5 minute drive, 15 minute bike ride. I would bring a backpack with a change of clothes and change in the bathroom once I got to the office.
Bad phrasing. I read your previous comment as demanding an explanation from me for why the author wrote an article about simple design rather than about user testing.
Honestly, I don’t think the article would have been well-served by detouring into user testing. It’s long enough as it is, and again – NN group has written a LOT on the topic.
I’m not really sure why you brought it up in the first place. It seems like ‘beating a dead horse’ territory.
Why are you asking me? I didn’t write the article.
It’s not the point of this article. NN group talks a lot about user testing in other articles, IIRC.
I’m on board as soon as we verify that Putin has completely disarmed.
I see some of that in my job. We put encrypted data in settings files, and the keys for decryption are provided on the VMs where we deploy. The developers never actually see the keys.
I suppose it’s as secure as the process for managing the production VMs, assuming the encryption isn’t just md5!
Hmm, that makes me think we could adopt a tiered pricing system for things like water. The first 100 gallons are priced at 10 cents each, then usage beyond that goes up to 50 cents each?
You could tweak the rates & threshold to make more sense – I don’t know water rates off the top of my head, and that probably varies by orders of magnitude across the entire U.S. Also, I have no idea what water usage rates look like for different types of properties. A sports stadium, an office building, an aluminum processing plant, and a SFH with a rain garden will all have really different water usage details.
All this is kind of hinting at a broader “environmental impact” measure. That gets super complicated, though.
Jury duty stipends indexed to cost of living.
Today, in my county, you get $20 a day. That won’t even cover parking near the courthouse.
Serving on a jury shouldn’t prevent you from being able to make rent for the month.
Image generation requires no fact checking whatsoever
Sure it does. Let’s say IKEA wants to use midjourney to generate images for its furniture assembly instructions. The instructions are already written, so the prompt is something like “step 3 of assembling the BorkBork kitchen table”.
Would you just auto-insert whatever it generated and send it straight to the printer for 20000 copies?
Or would you look at the image and make sure that it didn’t show a couch instead?
If you choose the latter, that’s fact checking.
That said, LLMs will always have limitations and true AI is still a ways away.
I can’t agree more strongly with this point!
Some problems lend themselves to “guess-and-check” approaches. This calculator is great at guessing, and it’s usually “close enough”.
The other calculator can check efficiently, but it can’t solve the original problem.
Essentially this is the entire motivation for numerical methods.
Efficient at confusing people, perhaps. Personally, I have no idea what you’re on about.
Ni! Ni!
I’m curious, why do you write it “70ies” instead of “70s”?
The former always makes me say “seventy-ies” as I read it. Kinda funny.
I don’t think they’re merely complaining about synecdoche…