![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
You’d love singapore’s name for the toilet to tap, it’s call NEWWater.
You’d love singapore’s name for the toilet to tap, it’s call NEWWater.
It was “not a mistake” for army leadership to not having a contact with the dude.
It’s not Palestine. No one cares /s
To be honest it always bothers me that civil wars have been raging in one or the other African country throughout last century, genocide, ethno-state, famine etc have been raging almost all the time.
It’s never been interesting enough for most media in east or in the west. Heck even some media in Africa doesn’t care either. Some human rights groups care, but their funding is limited, and no one questions who is supplying weapons to African genocide propogators and I used to think it’s all Russian or Russian copied Chinese weapons, but last year when I was looking at things in depth, they also have NATO weapons, but I couldn’t find how they got it.
IT’S BBC.
Amen
Legit question
Probably was not much different. My guess is it jumped from like 35% to like 40%. Important thing I see is GDP per capita is growing steadily, wish there was something government was doing to combat equality more, but I don’t trust for a second alternative government’s would address this either.
Considering how strict he is, doubt they’re getting out of prison soon.
But the original comment says, 3-5 that’s clearly negative 2.
Learn to count people /s
Smokescreen or not I just want SBI to release names.
I read books after the show, very rare few cases I can sit through so many books even when I know the story.
I trust no articles from SCMP.
Don’t listen to downvotes, just bots, u gave me a chuckle
I think these days that’s the rule, if it piques your interest but you have some trouble understanding headline, you may just click on the article
I think these people just want to watch the world burn, contribute nothing, consume attention, waste time… You know like those early day virsu that would just bog up CPU but would do nothing else… Some people just enjoy wasting other people’s resources.
Just shows how complicit people are, even when guillotineing a billionaire, we don’t know how to acquire their wealth, anyway other comments explain how to do that.
I mean i get your argument, but super-critical plants can only serve baseload, they need 48 hours to prime and can generally not operate below 50% capacity, they do yield very high efficiency though.
But I’m not sure where this discussion is going.
Coal power can’t really be used for on-demand scenarios, as coal fired power plants have massive startup costs and also time. Compared to a gas-turbine that can do a cold boot up to maximum production in 15 minutes. Coal needs about 4-5 hours to come to full power and that is with the best expensive technology we have not necessarily technology that is in use. Also coal plants take about 2 hours to shutdown and about 20 hours to be ready to be fired again. It’s just a limitation that we can’t overcome from complications due to coal being a solid fuel.
So whatever coal China has it must be using for baseload, they must have more alternatives if their coal fired capacity is decreasing.
EDIT: adding more context, so I have been hearing this coal as peak load instrument for a while now, so I decided to dig deeper on who is claiming this and why? So there are two claims in this space out there 1st being that for larger plants that can operate at sub 20% capacity can scale between sub20% to 100% in minutes making them useful for peak load, and that is just stupid argument as whatever minimum they are running it is still baseload.
Other argument is actual redisgn of plants that allow for quick cycling, but technology is new and they can cycle even 4x in a day, but they operate at relatively less efficiency and also since they don’t ever go cold they start plants semi hot, they can’t clean the boiler with forced draft, leading to increased maintenance cost during full cleanup shutdown significantly and also they deal with thermal stress a lot more leading to increased cost of wear and tear. Seems like only CGS has been able to operate using this model and their gen capacity is only 480mW so seems like a proof of concept idea than actual possi ility of turning coal into peak load.
But at least it looks possible with some research, contrary to my previous opinion that it’s not possible at all, but seems to be still years before it can reach baseload efficiency and last thing we want to do is run coal at worse efficiency.
No the archaeological survey result just mean it’s inconclusive whether the situation is exactly same or not. No evidence doesn’t necessarily mean it didn’t happen, it just that we don’t know for sure if it happebd or not.
Sometimes I wonder if my instance will defederate from lemmygrad, I have hope.