Nah, of course not. Ideal team size for communications and decision (assuming we’re not skimping on output!) is 3 from memory (I’m struggling to grasp the mythical man month from over decades ago)
I really fail to see the problem. The open source community has long had a tendency for wacky names.
Oh my, that’s an itch I’d forgotten all about!
I’ve been wondering about this a little, if the exposure is greater than just increased spam and phishing risk (due to PII info being breached).
If they’ve got hashed credit card details and the last 4 digits, could they fire guesses at the hashes (just like l0phtcrack for CCs instead of windows SAM databases)?
How much risk is there to people’s personal funds via their credit cards?
So, there’s this thing called Java…
That would be awesome!
Cracking insight - well done!
Thanks for this, I really appreciate your nuanced stance.
I fear you may be correct, which feels uncomfortable (I disagreed with you originally)
But it is it a greater harm to decline her request and force her to endure suffering (or risk more drastic methods)?
I hear where you’re coming from (I think), and agree this is tragic, but part of me is jealous of her.
How much that part of me equates to changes each day with my tension headaches
Yeah, but back then you Americans had a government. I can’t see it happening with your current circus.
The EU, however, is already looking at MS over teams monopoly practises (fucking finally!), I’m hoping edge and copilot/bing are on their radar too!
Holy shit, really?
My change controls written in comic sans are going to a new level!
It’s great to see some progressive web developments after all these years of regressive trash
Just dont ding ya fancy stanchions!
Fucking flush the lot of these career degenerates
You think they’d learn after doubling down in the wool market and having the bottom fall out of it, they’re doing it all over again
Thing is, they’re still kicking ass on an international level and that’s pretty amazing.
Holy crap, really? That’s great - good on them!
I guess one of the central arguments (that we don’t actually need to prepare for the worst case scenario) isn’t wrong but we really don’t know what to expect when this all goes to shit. Are they really hoping they can put their head in the sand doing the bare minimum and then go to the courts when it wasn’t enough?
Personally, I’ve no confidence that we’ve accurately mapped the worst case scenario at all - I fear it’ll be much worse than we imagine (but I’m that far from starting a suicide cult, so don’t take my advice! )